Lewis Cass Karrick is an American fuel technologist and twentieth-century engineer for whom the karrick-process is named. The process is a low-temperature carbonization route for converting coal into char, tar/oil and gas. He is the central subject of a source dossier in the archive's low-temperature carbonization grouping.
Role in the source
The dossier presents Karrick as the developer of the named process and as the figure around whom the archive builds its account of low-temperature carbonization as a suppressed alternative to petroleum-derived liquid fuel. The process, the yield claims, and the historical-suppression narrative are all organized around him. The dossier treats his work as an early effort to obtain liquid fuel from solid feedstock at low temperature, and frames its later neglect as a matter of commercial displacement rather than technical failure.
The supplied sources are two University of Utah theses prepared under Karrick's direction: Larsen & Stutz (1932) on plant design, and Jacobsen & Carter (1933) on cannel coal tests. They name collaborators and institutional context, including Wardrop, Dean Ketchum, and the Utah Research Foundation.
Institutional context
The dossier presents Karrick as an engineer associated with the United States Bureau of Mines, working on the conversion of coal and oil shale into liquid and gaseous fuels. See US Bureau of Mines.
Claims attached to him
- Development of a low-temperature carbonization process operating below conventional coking temperatures.
- Reported pilot or demonstration-scale testing. The Larsen & Stutz thesis describes a University of Utah demonstration unit and a proposed commercial plant; the Jacobsen & Carter thesis reports eight test runs on Utah cannel coal. The sources also cite Karrick's earlier work at the Pittsburgh experimental station reported by Frey and Yent.
- The archive's assertion that the process was commercially sidelined by petroleum interests. This is the archive's framing, not a documented finding.
- Claims attributed to Karrick's process — notably the roughly one-barrel-per-ton-of-coal yield — are dossier assertions, not independently verified results. See Karrick Claims vs. Evidence: The Dossier's Assertions and the Absence of Test Data.
What the source does not establish
The ingested material consists of two theses (Larsen & Stutz 1932; Jacobsen & Carter 1933). It does not supply:
- specific patent numbers assigned to Karrick, which would warrant individual
entities/usXXXXXXXpages; - independent replication data; the theses report their own test runs and heat balances.
Nothing in the source establishes independent replication of the process.
Limits of the record
The supplied captures are text transcriptions of the two theses; some figures and sections are marked as not included. Biographical and technical specifics not present in the supplied text — dates, affiliations, patent numbers — should not be filled in from memory.
Related
- karrick-process — the named process associated with him.
- Low-Temperature Carbonization (LTC) — the general mechanism / underlying industrial chemistry.
- main-archive — the collection this dossier belongs to.
- US Bureau of Mines — the institutional context given in the dossier.
- Karrick Claims vs. Evidence: The Dossier's Assertions and the Absence of Test Data — comparison of dossier claims against evidence.
Source notes & attribution
- https://rexresearch.com/karrick/1jacar.htm
- https://rexresearch.com/karrick/1larstz.htm