Kozyrev Claims vs. Evidence: The Causal Mechanics Capture Without Data

This page compares what the source capture of Kozyrev's Causal Mechanics asserts with what the supplied material actually supports. It follows the established template used for other archive-hosted non-mainstream physics dossiers in the wiki.

The claims

The capture presents causal mechanics as a framework in which time is an active physical medium and cause–effect asymmetry is a physical property. The framework implies a non-electromagnetic signal channel by which processes are said to be detectable. These are the claims as reported by the account.

The evidence in the capture

The supplied material is a full text by L. S. Shikhobalov with postulates, formulas, and references. It contains:

• Descriptions of Kozyrev's experiments and a reported measurement of the course of time c2 ≈ 2200 km/s ≈ αc.
• References to independent researchers (e.g., Hayasaka and Takeuchi 1989; Lavrentyev et al.; Akimov et al.) and to null results (Faller et al. 1990; Quinn and Picard 1990).
• No named patent.
• No independent replication established in the source itself; the source reports confirmations and disputes.

The images are consistent with figures from a scanned or transcribed technical text, but their content and captions cannot be determined from the supplied material.

Assessment

The capture supports the existence of an archive-hosted account attributed to Kozyrev. It does not support the account's physical claims. Per Bench policy, the framework is recorded as an account, not as established fact.

Disambiguation

This comparison concerns causal mechanics, which is distinct from the mainstream time crystal phenomenon. Time crystals have peer-reviewed theory and experimental support; causal mechanics does not have an accepted mechanism. The two must not be merged.

Related pages

• Causal mechanics — the framework compared here.
• N. A. Kozyrev — attributed author.
• Bedini claims vs. evidence — a parallel dossier in the same genre.