A place for peculiar ideas.

Document text / 108 minute read

US2016176988

Download preserved PDF ↓

Opening preserved document…

Extracted document text. Layout, formulas and symbols may not survive extraction; consult the preserved PDF for the original presentation.

Text extraction covers 98 pages, including 98 transcribed by optical character recognition. Some transcribed passages remain difficult to read; use the preserved page images to check them.

Page 1

US 20160176988A1

as) United States
cz) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/0176988 Al
Zhang et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 23, 2016
(54) DNA-NANOPARTICLE CONJUGATES Publication Classification
(71) Applicant: Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC, (51) Int. Cl.
Upton, NY (US) CO7K 17/14 (2006.01)
C30B 29/68 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors: Yugang Zhang, Middle Island, NY C30B 29/38 (2006.01)
(US); Fang Lu, Middle Island, NY (US); GOIN 33/58 (2006.01)
Daniel van der Lelie, Chapel Hill, NC CO7K 14/36 (2006.01)
(US); Oleg Gang, Setauket, NY (US) (52)

ssssesssseeee CO7K 17/14 (2013.01); GOIN 33/588
(2013.01); CO7K 14/36 (2013.01); C30B 29/58

(21) Appl. No.: 14/876,899 (2013.01); C30B 29/68 (2013.01)
(57) ABSTRACT
(22) Filed: Oct. 7, 2015 The bio-programmable crystallization of multi-component

functional nanoparticle systems is described, as well as meth-
ods for such bio-programmable crystallization, and the prod-
Related U.S. Application Data ucts resultant from such methods. Specifically, the systems
(62) Division of application No. 14/111,732, filed on Feb, “closed and taught herein are directed to improved strate-
ae gies for the DNA-mediated self-assembly of multi-compo-
25, 2014, now abandoned, filed as application No. rn . . :
PCT/US12/33380 on Apr. 12, 2012. nent functionalized nanoparticles into three-dimensional
° order superlattices, wherein the functionalization of the nano-
(60) Provisional application No. 61/475,172, filed on Apr. _ particles with DNA is independent of either the composition
13, 2011. of the material, or the shape of the nanoparticles.

Page 2

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 1 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 1A FIG. 18

FIG, iC

Page 3

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 2 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

EES NO

FIG, 2A FIG. 2B

FIG. 2D FIG, 2C

Page 4

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 3 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

kg-bapaen

eres)

FIG. 3

FIG. 4A FIG. 4B

FIG. 4D

Page 5

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 4 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

04 (Sys Tig 1B Shiigg 99

Lee ceeeetiennenee

Page 6

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 5 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

t z t T T r ¥
BOG O02 G08 O08 G08 O10 BI fa

FIG. 5C

D8 tome t . t r
SO Off O64 O06 COG BIG ORS OF

FIG. 5D

Page 7

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 6 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

a4

104

6.84

88 tempor y t t $ t t
800 902 904 O06 888 O48 ~ONe “his

FIG. 5E

B.B4

Page 8

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 7 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

aie T + t ? t
GOO 002 ODE ONG RG G4e O42 16

Q
FIG. 8G

omen Intensity from Sys-TAu, 36SAu,, 35
intensity from melting Sys-TAu, 365Au,, 38

5800 4

40004

300B 4

2600 +f

FIG, 5H

Page 9

Patent Application Publication

Pangig gamete

Jun. 23, 2016 Sheet 8 of 78

US 2016/0176988 A1

tmengity
S
Es

on ees
Bs

ES eobeandikem:
BS

Residuals
ALS.

as

sy
S

a as oe en ia

gvvioni ia re

Ee

HWS erMaamRe:

FIG. 54

Page 10

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 9 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG, 6A

Page 11

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 10o0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

Pande

FIG. 6B

Page 12

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 11o0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

DR.

Page 13

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 120f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 6D

“F

i

t

i

.

|

" E is = f a : i ie tet
tt ob & a a S «

Page 14

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 13 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

r :
Ls
:
ba.
:

FIG, 6F

Page 15

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 14 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

204

104

5-4

t z 7 t T T t
O00 BSE O04 Gk OB 816 O12 O44

Q

FIG. 7A

t T 7 i r T

i
GGG 902 G64 O08 608 O10 O12 O14

FIG. 7B

Page 16

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 15o0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

1.04

FIG. 7D

Page 17

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 160f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

T T t
O05 992 006 O95 OO G1 Git

FIG, 7E

184

424

FIG. 7F

Page 18

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet170f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

AAO 4

1200-4

4000-4

intensity

r + t t t t r t
G00 9.02 O04 O08 608 O10 O42 G44 O18 O1E
Q

FIG. 7G

Db Tv T t T T T v
O00 002 BO 606 908 RID BAe BM

Page 19

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 18 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

Number (%}
a 8 &

s

42 48 38

Fa
Lona axis tenath fam)

Nurrber {%)

vs 80 38 16 1 cr)
Short axis length (am)

FIG. 8A

Page 20

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 19 of78 US 2016/0176988 Al

Particle diameter [A) stad vee sms
laihod weed. $4

400 , Humber of Rerations M9

f 6 Tao,
wa
fr 160x10~

bene
be

L 4. 4. Passsanan Saaeaet ON SET

F140

MN
8

{Qs GORNqUISsIP “jos sed

k- 100

intensity

F- 80

t 60

i 40

nila gyhistPm, ape hog pases 8,

eg

Residuals

r t t

t t rT
3 4 5 @ 7 ag

: SIT
Inensyongnia? Unb:
homuanetevaat Uns 0.04 04

ent USAKSHINROTADOLA YD! SOM GPF. % 306 DEN Qa) Mon, ec 12 eI. SEHR

© Size distribution of Q7

Size distrib ation (arbitrary unit)

0
Diameter (nm)

FIG. 8B

Page 21

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 20 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

Particle diameter {A}

Method used: NNLS
400 Number of iterations =¢00000
3 4 > of BY

core! :
r 70x10"
~ 60
+ 50 #
o
>
2 <
2 L. 40 2
& a
= a
~ g
a, 308
if
3
20>
3
10
w
8 UU Q
s odetocersty _ 0a6:
3S aReauiaeListrbation «“Yoites a
& = tins:
x foscand ave a: .
J ESSE ; r et
: 3 2 3 2 &§ 6 7 8 86
> Renee es: 001 at
vos I8AXSireracat STEM OOFime, 1 AONTSAL QB} ee ec 0, 2000 FUR He

© Size distribution of Q5
orn CHO Pek fitting:
[women Sum of fitting

Size distribution (arbitrary unit)

FIG. 8C

Page 22

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 210f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

Particle diameter [Aj
Method used: NNLS
100 2200000
3 4 6 6789 2 3 _ Numpber of ferations =2900
: bed i a 6
250x10
20
2
> c
@ Site 150 §
100 §
&
S
3
505
2
s i
B
rn
a 5
* a oT t t a as Se Se ee
yo etensrfeama Ura
corms g 2 3 4 & 6 7 8g
cea "0.01 a4
reo USAXS impontedtiataY gt {1@4_GiFree_S B0SOSMt int a wy Mon Gec 19, 2010.2 53:44 PL

1 0 Size diststbution of O5
—tworpeak

Size distribution (a-bitrary unit)

$8 60 70 ®
Siametor (nm)

FIG. 8D

Page 23

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 22 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

* t r t ¥
OR G07 OO 086 ot Oi Ri ote

3
HOC ON (GO OK GOR UNO Os he

FIG. 9B

Page 24

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 23 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 9C

FIG. 9D

aod}

a4

t
oon

t
OnE

Page 25

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 240f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

2544

Gos

0M 002 004 O06 O68 Ot ote O18

FIG. 9E

i ss es 3 i r r r
C00 G02 O04 EGG 60R O30 OTR Oe

Q

FIG, OF

Page 26

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 250f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

t59 |

48

26
004. 008 0.12

FIG. 10

Page 27

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 260f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

ie

Da

Ob

v t 3% aan Oe -
OX O02 O08 G06 ~ONe 01 OT O44
a

FIG. 11A

QD:AB-DNA&TH 1120)

FIG, 11B

Page 28

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 270f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

2B
264
384
w®

304
OS

$ messager $ v r t v

C00 C82 684 806 (O08 Ot 812 BAF

a
FIG. 11¢

ey

ado 902 6M 006 908 GIG Ofte. One

FIG. 11D

Page 29

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 28 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

Boy

= 10:1:20,

184

a4

ho4

t T t T T t r ss
GMO 0.02 0.04 0.08 0B MR

Q

FIG. 11E

Page 30

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 29 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 11F
| idati thu
i rirlil L
S |
° ih
| im di ih duals

Li | 1 Lu Lalit ithe
0.00 6.02 0.04 606 008 O10 0.12 0.14

FIG. 11G

Page 31

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 30 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

t T T T T + t
G0) 802 OFA 9OR BEE OW UR oe
a

FIG. 124

, ay t t r t r
POS O8e GN GOR ONE Gin hye 38

&

FIG, 22B

Page 32

Patent Application Publication

Jun, 23,2016 Sheet 31 of 78 US 2016/0176988 A1

24

0.0:

r t t t T T 5
£00 802 004 O08 008 079 G52 dae
Q

FIG. 12€

284
C64

Gad

24

a0

tT r T t t
BM 052 $04 005 O88 816 GR tld

FIG. 12D

Page 33

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 32 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 12E

t t 7 r t T T T
oOo 062 8.08 O06 O88 Of O42 Oe

FIG. 12F

Page 34

Patent Application Publication

Jun, 23,2016 Sheet 33 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

2a~

mn

404

t
8

t a T T t r
OR 864 GOH O88 G30 Bie OM

FIG. 12G

OM OO 004 AOR NOB G1 Oe ote
Q

FIG. 12H

Page 35

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 34 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

0
Sys-Q7A18gg 26

t t z ss t T
0G 202 8.0% 906 O48 Of G42 B44

Q

FIG. 13A

Vas

Sys-Q7A16y9 53 6

144 :

134

0.94

BB+

t t T t t t
BOO DUZ O04 Ons O88 GIG GN2 D4

FIG. 13B

Page 36

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 350f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

Particle diameter [Ay

100

FIG. 13C

Page 37

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 36 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

me Sys QTA_Conirot ¥ We date

‘ae4 enone SYE-QIA TS ond omomae Fits
seven ByS-OTARE i
. amine SSCITASO |

an baamnetiy 054 QE=1.14*exp(-Dv15.3)
e » wey
2 Ss |
“ B aad
« ee
aa
= 4
ae
® :
om ee 702 780 ako 4 Cae aie ee ee er ee
Wavelength (nen) Surtace-tonirtsns 1D (nt)
Fig. 144 Fig. 14B

Fig. 154

Page 38

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 370f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

Particle diameter [A

400
v9

intensity
eS

Es

&

t

icf uorBannG oSeniea

=

T
oO
&
Sa

Residuais

fawrsadrignd |
femoris

oy t 7 senna Sees an Wee
tae ET z 3 a fb & F Be

3 8
eo 4

Ra UARSapdtatiate PGI ION FSP te8 2, Moe DONE et OG “Tas, Doe 14 ete, ase mR PLL

Page 39

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 38 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

o
14
a r 3 + T
8.98 Hed one O32
Q
FIG. 16A

. . t . 7 7 t
$00. OR 106 GOS. 8.08. 040 faz ote

FIG. 16B

Page 40

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 39 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 16C

t t T r T T
O00 C82 B08 008 OR 810 B42 Oe

FIG. 16D

Page 41

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 40 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 16E

FIG. 16F

Page 42

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 41 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 17A

Page 43

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 42 0f 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

some S98 JASE C2

comme By AAAEE 184

oor Sys JAR MOG

semememeen Sue ASO C28
{lwo days tater}

FIG. 176

Page 44

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 43 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

B48

i r t ss t T
Hob 602 804 O08 BOF OI ete Mw
Q

FIG. 184

FIG. 18B

Page 45

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 44 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 18C

204

+54

41044

t Tr Tv t t r :
ooh 0.02 O88 666 OB O18 GAR B14

FIG. 18D

Page 46

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 45o0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

i : .
“45b spacer, 15-bp linker»

&

eee he eS

ineb spacer

FIG. 19

Page 47

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 46 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

: . * araseoneeapanseneneys 3
Bue OOF Mk 8G OS ute te oad
isi

FIG. 20A

Qa Gy

FIG. 208

Page 48

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 470f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

acl
4

FIG, 20C

FIG. 20D

Page 49

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 48 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 21A

Page 50

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 49 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 21B

Page 51

US 2016/0176988 A1

Jun. 23, 2016 Sheet 50 of 78

Patent Application Publication

feocccenvoveemnoccnnnooreneoc

IT? ‘Sd

st

: : y /

OTE
Oe

BAZ serwommennitay

pees

RecA

Page 52

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 51o0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 21D

Page 53

US 2016/0176988 A1

Jun, 23, 2016 Sheet 52 of 78

Patent Application Publication

|
d
|
8

dT¢ “SI

A

Page 54

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 53 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

au

FIG. 21F

2a

Page 55

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 540f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

SBE Z. semnconnrnennnronnnrecnnsenennscnniratitet

FIG. 21G

SEES,

LOSE.
1A

ee

Page 56

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 55o0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

_{indadadadataatabataheheiadasadainiaaggasatanehehedasaiabniniadssataneneh g
Bee
a
<=
ct
N
v7)
LL.
OR 4 a
FDP nnccnancemnnnnannnnnnasanell
t ws
& ce
& a 2

Page 57

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 560f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

Bysol Bion its rewsgenetic: fields {H}

Resreawe Ht

High #

oon 002 Ob OR Oe Ot

Q

FIG, 224

Page 58

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 570f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

SygtAL130 in magnetic field {H}

O08 002 80 086 OO 6.18

Q

FIG. 22B

Page 59

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 58 o0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

ain

204 Sys Shig

a

Gm

Uo4

z T r
O00 902 806 Gus bob O10 B42 04d
Q

s
oa
a

scotty t ¢ r
OOo ORE OG4 GOR 6.08
a

FIG. 23B

Page 60

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 59 of78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG, 23C

FIG. 23D

Page 61

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 60 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

e

3s " peep
OH ORS G04 ROE OS OH Gt ote

FIG. 244

FIG. 24B

Page 62

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 61 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG, 24C

FIG. 24D

Page 63

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 62 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 24F

Page 64

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 63 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

a * [ee toyie
=
& oh
z =
5 «0
‘4 8 i
20.
0 18 20
Wavelength (ern) Surface-to-Surface Distance (nm)
FIG. 25A FIG. 25B
mR RR
R= trosllsas }
40.

intonsity (3.u }

&
Enhancement-to-quenching factor (%)
8
—
ol

a P a an 0 70 6 2
‘Wavelength ‘nen ‘Surface-to-Surface Distance (nm)

FIG. 25C FIG. 25D

Page 65

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 64 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 26

8.04 0.08 O48

FIG, 27
‘rome Syvs-QFO Control
1804 sonseone Sy5-GPDIB
eee SyS-QPUED

Bo

a0

Intensity

80 BS

Page 66

US 2016/0176988 A1

Jun. 23, 2016 Sheet 65 of 78

Patent Application Publication

82 Sid

SSHN/Jda
—

HOOD

2QoudospAH

Page 67

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 66 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

Catalytic Pd Magnetic Fe,0;
f=15~25 f=3~8

2 's0nm_,
ee

009000?

60000 0 60000
H (Oe)

FIG. 29 FIG. 30

Page 68

Patent Application Publication

Fluorescent QD
f=20~40

CdSe/ZnS, CdTe/ZnS

intensity (a.u.)

Jun. 23, 2016 Sheet 67 of 78

Plasmonic Au
f=45~60

ic,
eS

450 «600750
Wavelength (nm)

FIG. 31

400 600
Wavelength (nm)

FIG. 32

US 2016/0176988 A1

Page 69

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 68 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 33A FIG. 33B

Page 70

Patent Application Publication

FIG. 33C

FIG. 33D

Jun, 23, 2016 Sheet 69 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

“"" 400 200 300
& (nm)
@ SAXS Data
39 | DC-WLC Model
204

40

Page 71

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 70 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 34A

Ww fy ee

Sys_FeO

° FeO_Augs 65

S(q)

'
peed HO
t : itera serccammaneang
v FeO_Au, 515

T
(3) 8 egy 3
% H a
» ANY
'
4 o STV_Augs 45

+ STV_Auy 45

0.03 0.06 0.09 0.4

Page 72

Patent Application Publication

FIG. 34B

Jun, 23, 2016 Sheet 71 of 78

FIG, 34C

US 2016/0176988 A1

@ Feo NP
'® Au@Feo NP

FeO_Auss 45 —-
rw FeO_Ausg 35 ~@-
\ _*s
“se
‘
Phase_Fo ‘Ny. —m

“@- ~@!

4

+ 40

40

Page 73

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 72 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

@ Dss from SAXS data 470
fmm DG Model with « =180° 4
b+— DC Model with « =109° <7” 460
120 ont _e- -h- -
3 {50 =
—_—/ &
3 1501 ji a0

180 4

FIG. 34D

Page 74

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 73 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12

q

FIG, 34E

Page 75

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 74 0f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 35A FIG. 35B

& om QD
: x CdSe

ran
ye
fs 4

oud *
: Q5_Aug 4 5

CdSe

S(q)
Ss@

Page 76

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 750f78 US 2016/0176988 Al

FIG. 35C

180
150;
120

7 — @aunp 708

604 -
drt tf @Q7
a GAunPia7 |, 4

40 80 420 160

€ (nm)

30

Page 77

Patent Application Publication

35

304

Dy, (nm)

20;

15-

Jun. 23, 2016 Sheet 76 of 78

ie 45

oy 145

dine

‘DC Model
k 4

Q7_Au Q6_Au Q5_Au

FIG. 35D

US 2016/0176988 A1

Page 78

Patent Application Publication

Jun. 23, 2016 Sheet 77 of 78

US 2016/0176988 A1

150 Ae
8100 Q7 eS Assembly
—d
2
g 50
g Me,
Ebene —=
600 6680 700 750 Free QD Superlattice —
Wavelength (nm) porn
70) ~~ = === gan +.
| Acceptor 4 H
qo0 FSi
Ro
© | Donor  i=526nm i
hl] || aglee ence re e--- $-)
10 2 1] Setar
40 8 0
time (ns) Free QD Superlattice
FIG. 35E FIG, 35F

Page 79

Patent Application Publication Jun. 23,2016 Sheet 78 of 78 US 2016/0176988 Al

Component A
. A
FIG.36A ge sata QD gt
50) om r —_
“Wl FCCHike Crystals
40; |@ * Bcc a
A Cluster A
30] ty oe ™ §
4 Weakly ordered E
20 q Q 8
10
A A \
0 10 20 30 40 50
FIG. 36B 95] rc moons
99 | mm RB
~ 25
§ 2
9
a 45
104
54
o4

Au_Q5 Au_Q7? AuPC Au PD Q7_Q5 Q7_PD Q7_PC PD_PC

Page 80

US 2016/0176988 Al

DNA-NANOPARTICLE CONJUGATES

CROSS-REFERENCE TO A RELATED
APPLICATION

[0001] This application isa divisional application related to
US. application Ser. No. 14/111,732, filed on Feb. 25, 2014,
which is the U.S. National Phase of International Patent
Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/033380, filed Apr. 12,
2012, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S.
Provisional Application No. 61/475,172 filed on Apr. 13,
2011, the contents of which are incorporated herein in their
entireties.

STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT LICENSE
RIGHTS

[0002] This invention was made with Government support
under contract number DE-AC02-98CH10886, awarded by
the U.S. Department of Energy. The Government has certain
rights in the invention.

1. FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0003] The inventions disclosed and taught herein relate
generally to the field of DNA-mediated particle assembly,
and, more specifically, to DNA-mediated self-assembly of
multicomponent functionalized nanoparticles into three-di-
mensional (3D) ordered superlattices.

2. BACKGROUND

[0004] The ability to control and regulate the kinetic behav-
ior of DNA-based nanosystems is required for emerging
nanoparticle applications in sensing, nano-device assembly,
and gene delivery, among other applications. DNA-based
methodology takes advantage of the tunable and program-
mable hybridization between DNA-capped nanomaterials.
This approach has allowed for the development of sensitive
detection systems based on the optical and physical proper-
ties of assembled nanoparticles, as well as detection based on
their novel melting/disassembly properties.

[0005] In 1996, the Mirkin and Alivisatos groups showed
that thiolated deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) oligonucleotides
can be attached onto gold nanoparticle surfaces to direct the
formation of larger aggregations (Mirkin, C.A., etal., Nature,
1996. 382(6592): p. 607-609; Alivisatos, A. P., et al., Nature,
1996. 382(6592): p. 609-611, each of which is incorporated
by reference in its entirety). Since then, there have been many
efforts to use the lock-and-key property of DNA to achieve
ordered arrangements of gold nanoparticles. Only very
recently, several groups independently demonstrated the suc-
cessful DNA-guided three-dimensional crystallization of
gold nanoparticles (Nykypanchuk, D., et al., Nature, 2008.
451(7178): p. 549-552; Park, S. Y., et al., Nature, 2008. 451
(7178); p. 553-556; Xiong, H. M., D. van der Lelie, and O.
Gang, Physical Review Letters, 2009. 102(1): p. 015504-(1-
4); and Macfarlane, R. J., et al., Angewandte Chemie-Inter-
national Edition, 2010. 49(27): p. 4589-4592, each of which
is incorporated herein by reference in its entirely). In these
studies, it was found that either face-centered cubic (FCC) or
body-centered cubic (BCC) structures with tunable lattice
parameters can be formed by controlling the type, number
and length of the DNA sequences. DNA length, rigidity, and
number were proven to be the key parameters for gold nano-
particle crystallization.

Jun. 23, 2016

[0006] During the last decade, functional nanomaterials
have become a hot research topic due to their importance and
wide-spread application potential, ranging from magnetic
recording media, catalysts, solar cells, biomedicine, and so
on. The ability to assemble multi-component nanoparticles
into three-dimensional ordered superstructures is of particu-
lar interest for building advanced metamaterials with novel
magnetic, plasmonic, photonic, and catalytic properties.
Among many assembly techniques, DNA-mediated nanopar-
ticle assembly has emerged as a powerful and versatile strat-
egy that has many advantages due to the synthetically pro-
grammable length and recognition properties of DNA.

[0007] However, up to now, assembly in organized struc-
tures of DNA-functionalized objects has mainly been limited
to gold nanoparticles. The main reason being that gold nano-
particles can be easily coated with a dense DNA shell by
simply replacing the weak surfactants, e.g., citrate, cetyltri-
methylammonium bromide (CTAB) etc., used during the syn-
thesis process, by thiolated DNA. For synthesis of nanopar-
ticles with different composition other than gold or gold
materials with more complex morphologies, the functional-
ization is very difficult because surfactants that are routinely
used with these nanoparticles bind tightly to the surface,
making their removal very difficult. For instance for Au nano-
particles with complex shapes, such as Au rhombic dodeca-
hedra and octahedra with cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) as
surfactant, directly replacing CPC with thiolated DNA will
result in Au particle aggregation due to the low DNA-CPC
exchange efficiency. In this case, fortunately, since CPC is not
a very strong surfactant, one can first use a high CTAB con-
centration to partially exchange CPC, and then replace CTAB
by thiolated DNA (Jones, M. R., et al., Nature Materials,
2010. 9(11): p. 913-917, which is incorporated herein by
reference in its entirety).

[0008] However, for Au polyhedrons synthesized with
much stronger ligands or long polymers as surfactants, like
poly-diallyl-dimethylammonium chloride (PDDA) and poly-
vinyl-pyrrolidone (PVP), the surfactants are very difficult to
replace and consequently, to date, there are no reports on their
functionalization with DNA and use in programmable assem-
blies. For materials other than gold, such as palladium nano-
particles synthesized with PVP, direct thiolated DNA fune-
tionalization is impossible due to difficulty to DNA
penetration and the much weaker thiol-palladium affinity. As
a result of these functionalization problems, the components
for DNA directed ordered nanoparticle assembly and crystal-
lization have been limited to gold. Additionally, although
there have been some recent reports on extending the particle
component to other inorganic materials, suchas silver (Lee, J.
S., et al., Nano Letters, 2007. 7(7): p. 2112-2115; Pal, S., et
al., Chemical Communications, 2009(40): p. 6059-6061,
each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its
entirety), quantum dots (Maye, M. M., et al., Chemical Com-
munications, 2010. 46(33): p. 6111-6113, which is incorpo-
rated herein by reference in its entirety), silica (Hilliard, L.R.,
etal., Analytica Chimica Acta, 2002. 470(1): p. 51-56, which
is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) and iron
oxides (Cutler, J. I., et al., Nano Letters, 2010. 10(4): p.
1477-1480; Lee, C. W., et al., Journal of Magnetism and
Magnetic Materials, 2006. 304(1): p. B412-E414, each of
which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety),
there are still no reports on incorporating such materials into
three-dimensional (3D) ordered structures using the concept

Page 81

US 2016/0176988 Al

of programmable assembly offered by functionalization with
biological compounds, including nucleic acids, preferably
DNA, and proteins.

[0009] For most types of particles used for catalysis and
other advanced applications, surface capping with high affin-
ity ligands or long polymers is inevitable during their synthe-
sis process. This makes it hard for DNA to replace or pen-
etrate the ligand shell, and thus functionalization becomes a
challenge. Furthermore, the application of strong ligands is
not only limited to nano particles with composition different
from gold, for instance quantum dots (QD) (Murray, C. B., et
al., Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1993. 115(19):
p. 8706-8715; Dabbousi, B. O., et al., Journal of Physical
Chemistry B, 1997. 101(46): p. 9463-9475, each of which is
incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) or palladium
(Lim, B.., et al., Advanced Functional Materials, 2009. 19(2):
p. 189-200, which is incorporated herein by reference in its
entirety), but also to synthesize and preserve the shapes of
non-spherical particles, even for Au (Sun, Y. G. and Y. N. Xia,
Science, 2002. 298(5601): p. 2176-2179, which is incorpo-
rated herein by reference in its entirety).

[0010] Insum, several challenges remain for the full exploi-
tation of DNA-mediated assembly of heterogeneous nanopar-
ticle assembly. DNA-functionalized nano objects are mainly
limited to gold nanoparticles. Materials coated with high
affinity ligands or polymers, such as palladium nanoparticles
coaled with PVP, or gold nanoparticles coated with PVP or
PDDA, fail to be further functionalizable with biological
molecules with the current state of the art. The range of nano
objects successfully used for DNA-directed crystallization
has been limited to gold nanoparticles. Although there are a
few, limited reports of DNA functionalized nanoparticle other
than gold, such as silver, quantum dots, silicon and iron
oxides, these nanoparticles have never been exploited as
nanoparticle building blocks that were subsequently used for
the programmable assembly of 3D artificial materials. The
structures of DNA-guided nanoparticle-nanoparticle assem-
blies have so far been limited to body-centered cubic (BCC)
and face-centered cubic (FCC) structures, which compro-
mises novel structure-related properties and their advanced
applications. Additionally, the cost of using thiolated DNA
for gold nanoparticle functionalization is very high compared
to using biotinylated DNA.

SUMMARY

[0011] The present disclosure describes a general strategy
for DNA-mediated self-assembly of multicomponent func-
tionalized nanoparticles into three-dimensional (3D) ordered
superlattices. The generally applicable strategy either allows
for removal of the high affinity ligands that bind to the nano-
particle surface and their replacement with other ligands that
do allow for subsequent functionalization with biological
groups (mostly for hydrophilic nanoparticles), or provision of
an additional ligand layer that allows for further functional-
ization with biological groups (mostly for hydrophobic nano-
particles), which can prevent irreversible and uncontrolled
aggregation of nanoparticles while preserving their unique
structures and physical properties. Such nanomaterials can
then be applied in various programmable assembly strategies.
[0012] The disclosure also demonstrates a generally appli-
cable strategy of how to functionalize nanoparticles with
DNA, independent of the composition of the material or the
shape of the nanoparticles. The generally applicable strategy
includes three steps, namely, carboxylic group grafting,

Jun. 23, 2016

streptavidin (STV)-conjugation, and biotinylated-DNA
attachment. In the first step, the ligands having a carboxylic
group are adopted for the nanoparticles by replacing the origi-
nal high affinity ligands or providing additional ligands with
the carboxylic acid functional groups. In particular, short
mercapto acid ligands, such as mercaptoundecanoic acid, and
amphiphilic polymers, such as lipid-PEG carboxylic acid,
may be used.

[0013] The subsequent two steps rely on | -ethyl-3-[3-dim-
ethylaminopropyl]-carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC)-as-
sisted chemistry and high specific and strong STV-biotin
binding. This DNA functionalization strategy is very versatile
and can be applied to a broad range of functional nanopar-
ticles. In the EDC-assisted streptavidin (STV)-conjugation.
the conjugate streptavidin can be covalently bound to the
particle surface by a reaction between the carboxyl (COOH)
group of the ligand and the amine (NH,) groups abundant on
the streptavidin (STV) surface. Finally, biotinylated-DNA is
coupled with STV on the particle surface due to the specific
binding between biotin and STV. This strategy has been suc-
cessfully demonstrated to assemble organized superstruc-
tures with magnetic (Fe,O5), plasmonic (Au), photonic
(quantum dot), and catalytic (Pd) materials, and protein (such
as STV), as well as combinations thereof. Also demonstrated
is that these ordered structures possess rich phases that until
now could not be obtained using the current state of the art in
nanomaterial assembly approaches.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0014] The following Figures form part of the present
specification and are included to further demonstrate certain
aspects of the present invention. The invention may be better
understood by reference to one or more of these Figures in
combination with the detailed description of specific embodi-
ments presented herein.

[0015] FIG. 1A shows SEM and TEM images for Pd nano-
octahedra (NO).

[0016] FIG. 1B shows SEM and TEM images for Pd
nanocubes (NC).

[0017] FIG. 1C shows SEM and TEM images for Pd nan-
ododecahedra (ND).

[0018] FIG.2A shows TEM images of Pd NCs with an edge
size of 640.5 nm.

[0019] | FIG.2BisaTEM image of Pd NCs with an edge size
of 100.8 nm.

[0020] FIG.2C isa TEM image of Pd NCs with an edge size
of 1220.9 nm.

[0021] FIG. 2D shows TEM images of Pd NCs with an edge
size of 232.6 nm.

[0022] FIG. 2E shows TEM images for Pd NOs with an
edge size of 15+1.3 nm.

[0023] FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of the assembly
system for direct hybridization of binary nanoparticles or
nanoparticles and protein entities.

[0024] FIG. 4A is a TEM image of thiol-DNA capped Au
nanoparticles with a diameter of 6.2+1 nm.

[0025] FIG. 4B is a TEM image of thiol-DNA capped Au
nanoparticles with a diameter of 8.81.7 nm.

[0026] FIG. 4C is a TEM image of thiol-DNA capped Au
nanoparticles with a diameter of 12.5+1.8 nm.

[0027] FIG. 4D is a TEM image of thiol-DNA capped Au
nanoparticles with a diameter of 14.72 nm.

[0028] FIG. 4E is a TEM image of streptavidin (STV)-
capped Au nanoparticles with diameter of 16.6+1.5 nm.

Page 82

US 2016/0176988 Al

[0029] FIG. 5A illustrates a 2D SAXS pattern and its cor-
responding S(q) of the Sys-AA9, s.

[0030] FIG. 5B illustrates a 2D SAXS pattern and its cor-
responding S(q) of the Sys-AA9,,.

[0031] FIG. 5C illustrates a 2D SAXS pattern and its cor-
responding S(q) of the Sys-AA9<o.

[0032] FIG. 5D illustrates a 2D SAXS pattern and its cor-
responding S(q) of the Sys-AA9go.

[0033] FIG. 5E illustrates a 2D SAXS pattern and its cor-
responding S(q) of the Sys-AA6.o.

[0034] FIG. 5F illustrates a 2D SAXS pattern and its cor-
responding S(q) of the Sys-AA125,.

[0035] FIG. 5G illustrates a 2D SAXS pattern and its cor-
responding S(q) of the Sys-AA1555.

[0036] FIG. 5H illustrates a 2D SAXS pattern of the melt-
ing Sys-AA9,,. at 710° C., with the gray and black 1D curves
corresponding to the scattering intensity of melting and
assembled Sys-AA9<o, respectively.

[0037] FIG. 51 illustrates fitting of the melting curve of Sys
AAD so.

[0038] FIG. SJillustrates a 2D SAXS pattern of the melting
Sys-AA15,, and its fitting.

[0039] FIG. 6A illustrates an exemplary schematic of the
Cu,Au structure (bottom) and the calculated S(q) for this
structure using Powder Cell in a two-atom system with an
atom number ratio (AR) of 17.

[0040] FIG. 6Billustrates the calculated S(q) for the Cu, Au
structure with an AR of 5.

[0041] FIG. 6C illustrates a schematic of the NaT] structure
(bottom) and the calculated S(q) for this structure with an AR.
of 17.

[0042] FIG. 6D illustrates the calculated S(q) for the NaT1
structure with an AR of 5.

[0043] FIG. 6E illustrates the calculated S(q) for the NaT1
structure with an AR of 2.

[0044] FIG. 6F illustrates the calculated S(q) for the NaT1
structure with an AR of 1.5.

[0045] FIG. 7A illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) for the Sys-POA.

[0046] FIG. 7B illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) for the Sys-PCA.

[0047] FIG. 7C illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) for the Sys-PDA,,

[0048] FIG. 7D illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) for the Sys-PDA,,.

[0049] FIG. 7E illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) for the Sys-PDAso.

[0050] FIG. 7F illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) for the Sys-PDAgg.

[0051] FIG. 7G illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding Ip(q) for a system of Pd NDs and Au without a
linker.

[0052] FIG. 7H illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) for Sys-PDA,, at 710° C. (black curve), and
after cooling down (gray curve).

[0053] FIG. 8A shows a TEM image of Q705, where the
QD has elongated shape, and the size distribution histograms
of long axis length and short axis length of the QDs in the
image.

[0054] FIG. 8B illustrates Ip(q), the fitting, and size distri-
bution for Q705.

[0055] FIG. 8C illustrates Ip(q), the fitting, and size distri-
bution for Q605.

Jun. 23, 2016

[0056] FIG. 8D illustrates Ip(q), the fitting, and size distri-
bution for Q525.

[0057] FIG. 9A illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) for Sys-Q7A,, for n=15.

[0058] FIG. 9B illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) for Sys-Q7A,, for n=18.

[0059] FIG. 9C illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) for Sys-Q7A,, for n=30.

[0060] FIG. 9D illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) for Sys-Q7A,, for n=50.

[0061] FIG. 9E illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) for Sys-Q7A,, for n=80.

[0062] FIG. 9F illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding Ip(q) for a system of Q705 and Au without a linker.
[0063] FIG. 10 illustrates the temperature-dependent phase
behavior for Sys-Q7A,, without pre-annealing.

[0064] FIG. 11A illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-Q7A,, with a mole ratio of QD:Au:
Biotin DNA::1:1:10.

[0065] FIG. 11B illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-Q7A3, with a mole ratio of QD: Au:
Biotin-DNA::1:1:120.

[0066] FIG. 11C illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-Q7A3o With a mole ratio of QD: Au:
Biotin-DNA::1:2:80.

[0067] FIG. 11D illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-Q7A3, with a mole ratio of QD: Au:
Biotin-DNA::2:1:40.

[0068] FIG. 11E illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-Q7A,, with a mole ratio of QD: Au:
Biotin-DNA::10:1:20.

[0069] FIG. 11F illustrates the calculated S(q) for a La,O,
structure using Powder Cell in a two-atom system with atom
number ratio (AR) labeled in the figure.

[0070] FIG. 11G illustrates a schematic of the La,O, struc-
ture.

[0071] FIG. 12A illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-QA6,, with n=15.

[0072] FIG. 12B illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-QA6,, with n=30.

[0073] FIG. 12C illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-QA6,, with n=50.

[0074] FIG. 12D illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-QA6,, with n=80.

[0075] FIG. 12E illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-QA5 with n=15.

[0076] FIG. 12F illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-QA5,, with n=30.

[0077] FIG. 12G illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-QAS5,, with n=50.

[0078] FIG. 12H illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-QAS,, with n=80.

[0079] FIG. 13< illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) Sys-Q7A16,, at 260° C.

[0080] FIG. 13B illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) Sys-Q7A16,9 at 530° C.

[0081] FIG. 13C illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern, its Ip(q),
and the fitting at 710° C. for the melting system.

[0082] FIG. 14A illustrates the photoluminescence of Sys-
QUA.

[0083] FIG. 14B illustrates a plot of the quenching effi-
ciency of Sys-Q7A against the surface-to-surface distance
between the QD and Au obtained by SAXS. The solid line is
a fitting using an exponential decay model.

Page 83

US 2016/0176988 Al

[0084] FIG. 15A illustrates a TEM image of iron oxide
Fe,0, (also refered to as IO or FeO) nanoparticles.

[0085] FIG. 15B illustrates the SAXS Ip(q) and the fitting
for the 1O nanoparticles, which indicate that they have spheri-
cal shapes with diameters of 10.20.7 nm.

[0086] FIG. 16A illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding 5(q) for Sys-IA,, with n=15.

[0087] FIG. 16B illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-1A,, with n=30.

[0088] FIG. 16C illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-1A,, with n=50.

[0089] FIG. 16D illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-1A,, with n=80.

[0090] FIG. 16F illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for the mixture of STV-IO and Au particles
without Biotin-DNA.

[0091] FIG. 16F illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern for the
mixture of STV-IO and Biotin-DNA without Au particles.
[0092] FIG. 17A illustrates S(q) as a function of tempera-
ture for Sys-IAjo.

[0093] FIG. 17B illustrates S(q) as a function of tempera-
ture for Sys-IA,,.

[0094] FIG. 18A illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-IA3, with the mole ratio IO:Au:
Biotin-DNA::1:1:7.

[0095] FIG. 18B illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-IA,, with the mole ratio IO:Au:
Biotin-DNA::1:1:60.

[0096] FIG. 18C illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-IA,, with the mole ratio IO:Au:
Biotin-DNA::1:5:75.

[0097] FIG. 18D illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-IA3, with the mole ratio 1O:Au:
Biotin-DNA::5:1:75.

[0098] FIG. 19 is a schematic illustration of the assembly
system for linker assisted hybridization of binary nanopar-
ticles or nanoparticles and protein entities.

[0099] FIG. 20A illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-IAL,,, for n=O.

[0100] FIG. 20B illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-IAL,,, for n=30.

[0101] FIG. 20C illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-IAL,,, for n=70.

[0102] FIG. 20D illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-IAL,,, for n=170.

[0103] FIG. 214A illustrates a schematic of and the calcu-
lated S(q) for CsCl using Powder Cell in a two-atom system
with an atom number ratio (AR) of 2.6.

[0104] FIG. 21B illustrates a schematic of and the calcu-
lated S(q) for a-ReO, using Powder Cell in a two-atom sys-
tem with an atom number ratio (AR) of 2.6.

[0105] FIG. 21C illustrates a schematic of and the calcu-
lated S(q) for AuCu, using Powder Cell in a two-atom system
with an atom number ratio (AR) of 2.6.

[0106] FIG. 21D illustrates a schematic of and the calcu-
lated S(q) for La,O, using Powder Cell in a two-atom system
with an atom number ratio (AR) of 2.6.

[0107] FIG. 21E illustrates a schematic of and the calcu-
lated S(q) for NaT1 using Powder Cell in a two-atom system
with an atom number ratio (AR) of 2.6.

[0108] FIG. 21F illustrates a schematic of and the calcu-
lated S(q) for NaCl using Powder Cell in a two-atom system
with an atom number ratio (AR) of 2.6.

Jun. 23, 2016

[0109] FIG. 21G illustrates a schematic of and the calcu-
lated S(q) for ZnS using Powder Cell in a two-atom system
with an atom number ratio (AR) of 2.6.

[0110] FIG. 21H illustrates a schematic of and the calcu-
lated S(q) for CaF, using Powder Cell in a two-atom system
with an atom number ratio (AR) of 2.6.

[0111] FIG. 22A illustrates the magnetic field-dependent
2D SAXS pattern and corresponding S(q) for Sys-IA3o.
[0112] FIG. 22B illustrates the magnetic field-dependent
2D SAXS pattern and corresponding S(q) for Sys-IAL, 30,
[0113] FIG. 23< illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-SA,,, for n=15.

[0114] FIG. 23B illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-SA,,, for n=18.

[0115] FIG. 23C illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-SA,,, for n=30.

[0116] FIG. 23D illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-SA,, for n=50.

[0117] FIG. 24< illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-Q77, for n=3

[0118] FIG. 24B illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern for Sys-
Q77,, for n=15.

[0119] FIG. 24C illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern for Sys-
Q77, for n=30.

[0120] FIG. 24D illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-Q75,,, for n=3.

[0121] FIG. 24E illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-Q75,,, for n=30.

[0122] FIG. 24F illustrates the 2D SAXS pattern and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-Q75,,, for n=50.

[0123] FIG. 25A depicts the photoluminescence of Sys-
Q77,, including the control system (a mixture of Q7 and Q7
without biotin-DNA), for the n=18, 30 and 50 systems.
[0124] FIG. 25B illustrates the enhancement factor (EF) of
Sys-Q77 against the surface-to-surface distance between Q7
and Q7.

[0125] FIG. 25C illustrates the photoluminescence of Sys-
Q75,, including the control system (a mixture of Q7 and Q5
without biotin-DNA), for the n=18, 30 and 50 systems.
[0126] FIG. 25D illustrates the enhancement-to-quenching
factor (EQF) of Sys-Q75 against the surface-to-surface dis-
tance between Q7 and Q5.

[0127] FIG. 26 illustrates the 2D SAXS patterns and cor-
responding S(q) for Sys-QPD,, at different temperatures.
[0128] FIG. 27 illustrates the photoluminescence of Sys-
QPD.

[0129] FIG. 28 is a schematic illustration of the three-step
strategy for DNA functionalization of hydrophilic and hydro-
phobic nanoparticles (f—denotes the number of grafting
DNA on the nanoparticles).

[0130] FIG. 29 are schematics and SEM images for bioti-
nylated DNA-tethered palladium nano-cube (NC), octahe-
dron (NO), and dodecahedron (ND) that were coated with
PVP.

[0131] FIG. 30 is a schematic, TEM image (inset is
HRTEM), and hysteresis loop for biotinylated DNA-grafted
JO nanoparticles originally capped by oleic acid.

[0132] FIG. 31 is a schematic, TEM image (inset for
HRTEM), and photoluminescence spectra for biotinylated
DNA-attached CdSe/ZnS QDs (QD525, denoted by Q5, and
QD605, denoted by Q6) and CdTe/ZnS QDs (Q705, denoted
by Q7). TEM image is for Q7.

Page 84

US 2016/0176988 Al

[0133] FIG. 32 is a schematic, TEM (for 10 nm Au nano-
particles), and UV-Vis spectra for thiolated DN-functional-
ized Au nanoparticles, including 10, 15, 20 nm, originally
capped by citrate.

[0134] FIG. 33< illustrates plots of shape-dependent struc-
ture factors (S(q)) extracted from SAXS patterns of direct
hybridization (DH) systems with short DNA.

[0135] FIG. 33B illustrates in the top portion the Au nano-
particle size-dependent S(q) evolution of ND-Au DH sys-
tems, including PD hybridized with 15 nm and 20 nm Au.
[0136] FIG. 33C illustrates the effects of nanoparticle
shape on the correlation length (€) of binary systems
assembled by shaped and spherical NPs.

[0137] FIG. 33D is a plot showing the nearest neighbor
particle surface-to-surface distance (D,,), as illustrated by
inset, for ND-10 nm Au systems.

[0138] FIG. 34A illustrates plots of shape-dependent struc-
ture factors (S(q)) extracted from SAXS patterns of DH sys-
tems for Fe,O, (denoted as FeO in figures) and Au nanopar-
ticles. (1): S(q) for non-specific interaction induced Fe,0,
aggregates. (2): A DNA base number (N)-dependent evolu-
tion of S(q) from the single component Phase-F to a DNA-
directed Au-IO binary superlattice upon introducing Au
nanoparticles, tethering DNA direct complementary to that
on IO surface, into Sys_FeO; (3) S(q) for a DH system
assembled by STV and Au nanoparticles with longer and
shorter DNA.

[0139] FIG. 34B is a 3D schematic illustration for structure
switch between Phase_F and Phase_D via introducing Au
nanoparticles or elevating temperature.

[0140] FIG. 34C shows the assembly kinetics for Phase-F
and Phase-D. The inset is a 2D schematic for phase-D.
[0141] FIG. 34D isa plot ofthe D,, for IO-Au direct hybrid-
ization systems and the a calculated from geometrical con-
sideration based on the D,, values as a function of N. Inset
illustrates the definition of D,, and @ in the Au-IO supperlat-
tice.

[0142] FIG. 34E shows the experimental configuration for
SXAS measurement in a magnetic field (top) and the S(q)
magnetic response (bottom) of the IO-Au direct hybridization
systems.

[0143] FIG. 354A is a plot showing component-dependent
S(q) evolution of DH systems for QD-Au nanoparticles.
[0144] FIG. 35B shows the DNA-spacer length dependent
S(q) evolution of Q7-Au systems (top) and S(q) of a well
ordered Q7-Au system, which involves both flexible and rigid
DNA regions (bottom).

[0145] FIG. 35C is a plot showing the change of composi-
tional order parameter (ny) and correlation length (§) with
DNA base number (N) for DH Q7-Au systems. The inset
sketches the compositional order-to-disorder transition with
1 from | to 0 ina CsCl lattice formed in the binary Au and QD
systems.

[0146] FIG. 35D isa plot of Dss for QD-Au DH systems.
[0147] FIG. 35E is a plot of steady-state and time-resolved
PL spectra collected from Q7-Au direct hybridization sys-
tems.

[0148] FIG. 35F illustrates a sketch ofa CsC1 lattice formed
by Q7 and QS directed by DNA. FIG. 35F also shows a plot of
the lifetime (t) for donor (Q5) and acceptor (Q7) in the
free-dispersed states and superlattice Q7_Q5, 5.

[0149] FIG. 36A is a phase diagram for the heterogeneous
binary ~10 nm nanoparticle systems.

Jun. 23, 2016

[0150] FIG. 36B is a diagram showing an example (N=30,
DH systems) for the predictable interparticle center-to-center
distances (D...) for heterogeneous binary systems.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0151] In accordance with aspects of the present invention,
applicants have developed a general strategy for multi-com-
ponent DNA-guided three-dimensional (3D) assembly of
functional nanoparticles. The disclosure demonstrates a gen-
erally applicable strategy of how to functionalize nanopar-
ticles with DNA, independent of the composition of the mate-
rial or the shape of the nanoparticles. The disclosure further
demonstrates a programmable assembly of the DNA-func-
tionalized nanoparticles into predefined multi-dimensional
and multi-component, such as, but not limited to, magnetic
(Fe,O, and other magnetic materials), plasmonic (Au and
other metals), photonic (quantum dot, QD), and catalytic (Pd,
Pt, and others) materials, and protein (such as STV) struc-
tures. Described herein is a general strategy for DNA-medi-
ated self-assembly of multicomponent functionalized nano-
particles into three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattices.
Also described are exemplary embodiments of DNA-medi-
ated heterogeneous assemblies of nanoparticles including
new phases of known nanoparticle assemblies.

(A) DNA Functionalization

[0152] The generally applicable strategy either allows for
removal of the high affinity ligands that bind to the nanopar-
ticle surface and their replacement with other ligands that do
allow for subsequent functionalization with biological groups
(mostly for hydrophilic nanoparticles), or provision of an
additional ligand layer that allows for further functionaliza-
tion with biological groups (mostly for hydrophobic nanopar-
ticles), which can prevent irreversible and uncontrolled
aggregation of nanoparticles while preserving their unique
structures and physical properties. Such nanomaterials can
then be applied in various programmable assembly strategies.
[0153] The general strategy for multi-component DNA-
guided 3D assembly of functional nanoparticles is described
herein. First, a generally applicable strategy of how to func-
tionalize nanoparticles with DNA, independent of the com-
position of the material or the shape of the nanoparticles, will
be described. For DNA functionalization, there is provided a
facile method for the synthesis of non-commercially avail-
able nanoparticles with uniform size and shape. In a second
step, either the original high affinity ligands are replaced by or
additional ligands are provided with carboxylic acid func-
tional groups. In a third step, 1-ethyl-3-[3-dimethylamino-
propyl]-carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC)-assisted chemis-
try is adapted to covalently conjugate streptavidin onto the
particle surface due to the reaction between the carboxylic
(COOH) groups of the ligands and the primary amine (NH,)
groups that are abundant on the STV surface. Finally, bioti-
nylated-DNA is coupled with STV on the particle surface due
to the strong and specific affinity of biotin to STV. This
functionalization strategy is very versatile and robust. Certain
examples demonstrate how to assemble organized super-
structures with iron oxide (IO; such as magnetic Fe,0;),
plasmonic (Au), photonic (QD), and catalytic (Pd) materials,
and protein (STV), as well as combinations thereof. Also
demonstrated is that these ordered structures possess rich
phases that until now could not be obtained using the current
state of the art in nanomaterial assembly approaches.

Page 85

US 2016/0176988 Al

[0154] The methods of the present disclosure provide vari-
ous examples to illustrate the general process of the invention
for nanoparticle synthesis and subsequently DNA function-
alization. Depending on the capping agent used for their
synthesis, the nanoparticles can be divided into two classes,
namely, hydrophilic and hydrophobic. For hydrophilic nano-
particles, the initial step is to first replace the original ligand
by mercapto acid (MA), e.g., mercaptoundecanoic acid, and
thereafter to conjugate it with STV, and then finally couple it
with biotinylated-DNA. For hydrophobic nanoparticles, the
initial step is to either replace the original ligands or provide
additional ligands. In one embodiment, the initial step is to
treat the nanoparticles with one or more amphiphilic poly-
mers, such as lipid-PEG carboxylic acid, followed br a con-
jugation with STV and coupling with biotinylated-DNA. The
general procedure is shown in FIG. 28.

[0155] To demonstrate the universal applicability of this
strategy with respect to the hydrophilic nanoparticles, palla-
dium nanoparticles with different shapes are used as
examples. Palladium nanoparticles are important for hydro-
genation catalysis. To demonstrate the universal applicability
of this strategy with respect to the hydrophobic nanoparticles,
the iron oxide (IO) capped with oleic acid (OA), and quantum
dots (QD) capped with trioctylphosphine (TOPO) nanopar-
ticles are used as examples. Iron oxide is a typical magnetic
material and QD can be used as highly efficient luminescent
nanocrystals.

(B) Assembly of 3D Ordered Structure by Multi-Component
Functional Nanoparticles

[0156] Once nanoparticles are successfully encoded with
DNA, it is possible to either hybridize DNA-encoded nano-
particles or nanoparticles and proteins, independent of the
particle’s component, size, or shape, into 3D aggregations
due to the specific interaction of DNA. The 3D ordered phases
can be obtained by carefully controlling the interplay of inter-
particle attraction and repulsion energies, which can be
experimentally achieved in a variety of ways, such as by
controlling DNA sequence length, number and structure of
DNA molecules, and DNA structure hybridization tempera-
ture,

[0157] FIGS. 3 and 19 show a schematic illustration of an
assembly system for direct hybridization (DH) and linker
hybridization (LH) of binary nanoparticles, or nanoparticles
and proteins, respectively. In a DII assembly system, nano-
particles can be functionalized with DNA that has two func-
tional parts. One is non-complementary and forms the inter-
nal spacer part, which is designed to tune the repulsive
interaction between particles, and the other is complemen-
tary, forming the outer recognition sequence part, and which
provides the attraction interaction for nanoparticle assembly.
The spacer part on particle A (B) can be designed as X, (X;)
poly T bases and is denoted X,-b (X,-b) spacer in FIG. 3.
The total base number (N) is defined as X.,+X-b. Alterna-
tively, in a LH assembly system, nanoparticles can be func-
tionalized with DNA that has two functional parts, but neither
one complementary to provide the attraction interaction for
nanoparticle assembly. However, while the outer spacer
regions are non-complementary to each other, they are
complementary to the respective base ends ofa ssDNA linker,
which has a central flexible part (base number denoted by
L,,-b) separating the two ends. N is defined as X ,+X,+L,,-b
in LH systems. Generally, DH systems reveal quicker assem-
bly kinetics in comparison with LH systems involving similar

Jun. 23, 2016

DNA length. While the LH strategy proves more flexible for
system design, for example, regulation of the interparticle
distance can be achieved by simple tuning linker base number
without changing grafting DNA types.

[0158] The following examples are included to demon-
strate preferred embodiments of the invention. It should be
appreciated by those of skill in the art that the techniques
disclosed in the examples which follow represent techniques
discovered by the inventor(s) to function well in the practice
of the invention, and thus can be considered to constitute
preferred modes for its practice. However, those of skill in the
art should, in light of the present disclosure, appreciate that
many changes can be made in the specific embodiments
which are disclosed and still obtain a like or similar result
without departing from the scope of the invention.

EXAMPLES
Example 1

Synthesis of Palladium Nanoparticles with
Controlled Shapes (Octahedral, Cubic, and
Dodecahedral) and Size

[0159] Palladium (Pd) nanoparticles were synthesized in an
aqueous solution by a modifying the procedure described in
Lim et al. (2009). In the original reported procedure, only Pd
nanoparticles with cubic shape were obtained. Here, two new
shapes (octahedral and dodecahedral) were obtained by either
changing the KBr concentration or by using potassium iodide
(KI), which was an important modification of the reported
procedure.

[0160] Water soluble inorganic Pd salts, such as Na,PdCL,
or K,PdCl,, were used as a palladium source. Poly-vinyl-
pyrrolidone (PVP) (having a typical molecule weight (M.W.)
ranging from ~30,000 to 100,000) was used both as reluctant
and surfactant. Alkali metal bromides or iodides, such as
NaBr, KBr, Nal, and KI, were used as shape-controlling
agents. Bromides were used for the synthesis of nano-octa-
hedrons (NOs), nanocubes (NCs), and nanododecahedrons
(NDs), while iodides were used for the synthesis of dodeca-
hedrons. Ina typical synthesis procedure, a mixture of Pd salt
and alkali metal halide was first heated to about 80-100° C.
with a standard reflux system and kept at that temperature for
about 30 minutes. Then a pre-heated PVP solution was
injected into the mixture solution. The reaction was allowed
to continue for about 3-5 hours. For the synthesis of Pd NOs,
the mole ratio between Pd salt, bromide, and PVP was
approximately 1: (3-30):3-8) for temperatures around
80-90° C. and approximately 1:(3-15):(3-8) for temperatures
around. 90-100° C. For the synthesis of Pd NCs, the mole ratio
between Pd salt, bromide, and PVP was about 1:(15-30):(3-8)
for temperatures around 90-100° C. For the synthesis of Pd
NDs, if bromide was used in the reaction, the mole ratio
between Pd salt, bromide, and PVP was about 1:(30-60):(3-8)
for temperatures around 80-100° C. The Pd NDs may also be
obtained by introducing trace iodide to the reaction.

[0161] The mole ratio of Pd salt to bromide, iodide, and
PVP can be around 1:(3-60):(0.01-0.1):(3-8) and reaction
temperatures can be around 80-100° C. For the above three
synthesis reactions, Pd salt concentration typically ranges
between about 10 mmol/l to about 30 mmol/l. After the reac-
tion, the nanoparticle products were collected by centrifuga-
tion, and then purified by washing once with acetone and
subsequently three times with ethanol or water. The as-ob-

Page 86

US 2016/0176988 Al

tained nanoparticles can be well dispersed in ethanol or water.
The Pd nanoparticles obtained by such methods are uniform
in shape with no more than 15% unexpected shape, and also
have a narrow size distribution (<10%). The yield of nano-
particle for NOs, NCs, and NDs are about 70%, 50%, and
40%, respectively, calculated from the transformation of Pd
from salt form to nanoparticle form.

[0162] By regulating the synthesis parameters, such as
reactant ratio and concentration, temperature, and reaction
time, one can control the edge size of NOs, NCs, and NDs
ranging from about 6 to 13 nm. Generally, higher tempera-
ture, lower halide concentration, and longer reaction duration
will produce bigger nanoparticles. FIGS. 1A, 1B, and 1C
show scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) images for the prepared Pd NOs,
NCs, and NDs, respectively. The edge size of Pd NOs, NCs,
and NDs are 8.6+0.8 nm, 10+] nm, and 9+0.9 nm, respec-
tively. The synthesis parameters for Pd nanoparticles shown
in FIG. 1 are as follows: for NOs, [Na,PdC1,]-58 mM, mole
ratio Na,PdCl,:KBr:PVP (M.W. ~50,000)=1:20:5, tempera-
ture ~80° C., and the reaction time is about 3 h; for NCs,
[Na,PdCL,]=58 mM, mole ratio Na,PdCL:KBr:PVP (M.W.
~50,000)=1:20:5, temperature ~100° C., and the reaction
time is about 3 h; for NDs, [Na,PdCl,]=58 mM, mole ratio
Na,PdCl,:KBr:PVP (M.W. ~50,000)=1:50:5, temperature
=100° C., and the reaction time is about 3 h.

[0163] To grow larger palladium (Pd) nanoparticles, a seed-
mediated method was developed wherein small sized nano-
particles are used as seeds and Pd (0) is reduced and deposited
onto the surface of the seeds. Generally, using such a method
one can predictably produce Pd nanoparticles with good con-
trol of shape as well as with precise size control, even at the
nm level. The nanoparticle shape mainly depends on the ratio
of Pd salt to bromide or iodide, and such ratios for synthesis
of larger Pd NOs, NCs, and NDs are roughly the same as that
described above for the synthesis of the corresponding nano-
particles. The nanoparticle sizes depend on the ratio between
seeds and Pd salt, and a higher ratio of Pd salt will produce
bigger nanoparticles. For instance, one can use small sized
NCs as seeds to grow big sized NOs, NCs, and NDs. FIG. 2A
shows Pd NCs with an edge size of 6+0.5 nm, for which the
synthesis parameters are set as [Na,PdCl,]=58 mM, mole
ratio Na,PdCl,:KBr:PVP (M.W. ~50,000)=1:20:5, tempera-
ture=100° C. Using such NCs as seeds, bigger NCs with edge
sizes of 10+0.8 mm (FIG. 2B), 12+0.9 nm (FIG. 2C), 2342.6
nm (FIG. 2D), and bigger NOs with an edge size of 15+1.3 nm
(FIG. 2E) can be obtained.

[0164] The synthesis parameters for Pd nanoparticles
shown in FIGS. 2A through 2E are as follows: for NCs, the
growth solution is that [Na,PdCL.J=l1 mM, mole ratio
Na,PdCl,:KBr:PVP_ (M.W. ~50,000)=1:20:5, tempera-
ture=100° C., the reaction time is 3 h, and the mole ratio
between 6 nm NCs seeds and Na,PdCl, is 10° for 10nm NCs,
2:10° for 10 nm NCs, and. 2:10° for 23 nm NCs; for NOs, the
growth solution is that [Na,PdCL,J=1 mM, mole ratio
Na,PdCl,:;KBr:PVP (M.W. ~50,000)=1:10:5, tempera-
ture=80° C., the reaction time is 3 h, and the mole ratio
between 6 nm NCs seeds and Na,PdC1, is 1.5°10° for 15 nm
NOs.

Example 2
Functionalization of Pd Nanoparticles with Mercapto
Acid by a Ligand-Exchange Process

[0165] The PVP cap on the surface of Pd nanoparticles,
including NOs, NCs, and NDs, can be replaced with mercapto

Jun. 23, 2016

acid by a ligand-exchange process. The carbon number of
alkane can range between about 2 to 18, but a longer carbon
chain length may be better for stabilizing the nanoparticles.
The thiol group number in MA can be one, two, or more. The
typical ligand-exchange process can be described in three
steps. First, the pH value of the freshly prepared PVP-capped
Pd nanoparticles in aqueous solution was adjusted to about
6-9 by buffer, which contains about 0.01% to 1% (by volume)
surfactant. The buffer can be phosphate buffer, borate buffer,
etc., and the pH value can range between about 6-9. The
surfactant can be Tween (such as Tween 20), Triton (such as
Triton 100), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and so on. Mer-
capto acid (MA) in ethanol, for instance 11-mercaptounde-
canoic acid (MUA), is mixed with the above solution.
[0166] The mole ratio of mereapto acid can be about 10° to
10’ times to that of nanoparticles depending on the surface
area of nanoparticle, e.g., for Pd nanocubes with an edge size
of 10 nm the ratio can be about 2:10°. In the second step, the
above mixture was incubated at about 50-90° C, for about 3 to
12 hours after brief sonication for about 20 minutes to 1 hour.
Finally, the as-functionalized nanoparticles were purified by
a centrifugation-wash cycle procedure, where the particles
are washed two times with ethanol and three times with the
above buffer with surfactant. Such a functionalization proce-
dure produces MA-capped Pd nanoparticles which are well
dispersed in buffer or aqueous solution. This functionaliza-
tion method is robust and can also be applied for hydrophilic
materials other than Pd and other surfactants than PVP. The
materials can be gold, silver, platinum, and so on. The original
surfactant can be very broad and their charge can be varied
from negative charge, such as citrate, positive charge, such as
cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), cetylpyridinium
chloride (CPC), poly-diallyl-dimethylammonium chloride
(PDDA), to neutral charge, such as Pluronic P-123, Car-
boxymethy! Cellulose Sodium (CMC).

Example 3

Conjugation of Pd Nanoparticles with STV

[0167] The as-prepared MA-capped Pd nanoparticles (or
other component nanoparticles) can be conjugated with STV
by formation of an amide bond between carboxylic groups on
the nanoparticles, provided by the ligand, and primary amine
groups of STV through 1-ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropy]]-
carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC)-assisted chemistry. Typi-
cally, MA-capped Pd nanoparticles in buffer with pH about
6-8 are first mixed with freshly prepared EDC (about 0.1
mg/ml to 1 mg/ml), N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (NHS, about
0.1 mg/ml to 1 mg/ml) and STV. The quantity of STV can be
about 10 to 100 times that of the Pd nanoparticles. The mix-
ture is allowed to incubate either at room temperature for
about 1 to 4 hours or at 4° C. for about 6 to 12 hours. Finally,
the nanoparticles are collected by a centrifugation-wash cycle
procedure, where the particles can be washed three times by
water or the above motioned surfactant-containing buffer.
After purification, the nanoparticles are dispersed in surfac-
tant-containing buffer.

Example 4

Functionalization of Pd Nanoparticles with
Biotinylated-DNA

[0168] The as-prepared STV-capped Pd nanoparticles (or
other component nanoparticles) were coupled with biotiny-

Page 87

US 2016/0176988 Al

lated-DNA because of the strong and specific affinity of biotin
to STV. The DNA sequence from 5' to 3' of the recognition
part on A has a sequence TAC TTC CAA TCC AAT [SEQ 1]
and is complementary to the sequences on B, which is ATT
GGA TTG GAA GTA [SEQ 2] from 5' to 3'. The system was
denominated as Sys-Ajp,,,.,,X4B 5,2. where the subscript
D, and D, or E, and E, denote the diameter or emission
wavelength (for QD) of particle A and B, respectively.
[0169] The STV-capped nanoparticles were mixed with
biotinylated-DNA, which amounts can be used to control
DNA number on the particle surface, and the mixture was
allowed to incubate for several hours at room temperature.
Finally, the nanoparticles were collected by a centrifugation-
wash cycle procedure, where the particles were washed three
times by water or the above-mentioned surfactant-containing
buffer. After purification, the nanoparticles were dispersed in
surfactant-containing buffer.

[0170] The three kinds of Pd nanoparticles had uniform
shape and size and displayed the similar volume correspond-
ing to about 11 nm spherical particles as illustrated in FIG. 29.
The attached DNA number (f) was typically 15-25.

Example 5

Synthesis of IO and QD Particles

[0171] The synthesis of iron oxide (IO; e.g., Fe,O,) nano-
particles with sizes from about 4 to about 16 nm followed
procedures published by Hyeon, T., et al. Vournal of the
American Chemical Society, 2001. 123(51): p. 12798-12801;
incorporated herein by reference). Synthesis of quantum dots
(QDs) with emission wavelengths of 400 nm to 780 nm fol-
lowed procedures published in Dabbousi (1997) and Med-
intz, I. L., et al., (Nature Materials, 2005. 4(6): p. 435-446,
incorporated herein by reference).

Example 6

Functionalization of IO and QD with Carboxylic
Acid Groups

[0172] For the first method, iron oxide (Fe,O3) nanopar-
ticles or quantum dots (QDs) dispersed in an organic solvent,
such as toluene or chloroform, were first mixed with MA
(usually 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA)) in ethanol or
methanol solvent. Then the mixture was heated at about 50°
C. to 70° C, for about 4 to 12 hours after brief sonication for
about 5 to 30 minutes. Finally, the nanoparticles were col-
lected by a centrifugation-wash cycle procedure, where the
particles can be washed three times by water or the above
mentioned surfactant-containing buffer. After purification,
the nanoparticles were dispersed in surfactant-containing
buffer. This is similar to the procedure for QD published by
Kang, S. H., et al., (Applied Physics Letters, 2008. 93(19): p.
191116-1 to -3, which is incorporated herein by reference in
its entirety).

[0173] Forthe second method, Fe,O or QD dispersed in an
organic solvent, such as toluene or chloroform, were first
mixed with amphiphilic polymers, such as poly(maleic anhy-
dride alt-1-tetradecene), lipid-PEG carboxylic acid, which
have hydrophobic chains interacting with ligands on the
nanoparticles and carboxylic acid groups for further function-
alization. Then the mixture was incubated for about 2 to 4
hours at room temperature. After complete evaporation of the
organic solvent, the residual solid was purified by a centrifu-
gation-wash cycle procedure, where the particles are washed

Jun. 23, 2016

three times by water or buffer with pH about 7 to 9, such as
borate, TBE. After purification, the nanoparticles were dis-
persed in water or buffer. A similar procedure has been
reported by Pellegrino, T., et al. (Nano Letters, 2004. 4(4): p.
703-707; incorporated herein by reference in its entirety).

Example 7

Conjugation with STV and Biotinylated-DNA.

[0174] These two steps are nearly the same as those
described above for Pd nanoparticles. Although STV has
been used to functionalize Fe,O,, (Lee 2006 and Shen, T. T., et
al., Bioconjugate Chemistry, 1996. 7(3): p. 311-316, which is
incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) and QD
(Glazer, A. N., Bioconjugate techniques—Hermanson, G T.
Nature, 1996. 381(6580): p. 290-290, which is incorporated
herein by reference in its entirety), the resultant nanoparticles
have not undergone 3D crystallization.

[0175] Using the above procedure, uniform ~10 nm (diam-
eter) spherical nanoparticles of Fe.0, capped with oleic acid
(OA) having superparamagnetic properties were synthesized
as illustrated in FIG. 30. Hydrophobic commercially-avail-
able QD capped with trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO) of
three different emission peaks (Am) centered at 525 (core-
shell CdSe/ZnS), 605 (core-shell CdSe/ZnS), and 705 nm
(core-shell CdTe/ZnS) were also synthesized using the above
procedure as illustrated in FIG. 31. All the particles showed a
slightly elongated shape and the hard-core particle size was
about 2~3, 4~6, and 6~7 nm. Citrate-capped Au nanoparticles
of three different size (~10, 15, 20 nm) were also synthesized
with dense thiol-DNA as shown in FIG. 32. The attached
DNA number (f) on 16.8-nm Au, QD, and 10-nm IO nano-
particles is about 20 (45~60 for 10 nm Au), about 20-40, and
3-8, respectively.

Example 8

Particle Assembly

[0176] For particle assembly, a defined ratio of particles A
and B was mixed in 10 mM phosphate buffer with 0.14 M
NaCl, pH=7.1 at room temperature. The particles were
allowed to assemble into aggregates for from several minutes
to days, depending on the particle concentration. Subse-
quently the precipitates were split into two parts, one for
melting temperature measurements and the other, after trans-
ferring into a capillary, for structure measurement. The melt-
ing temperature was determined using UV-Vis spectroscopy,
monitoring the change in absorbance at the nanoparticles’
predominant absorption peak. The structure of the assembly
was analyzed by synchrotron-based small-angle X-ray scat-
tering (SAXS), which was performed at the National Syn-
chrotron Light Source X-9A beam line. If not specifically
mentioned, the samples in the capillary were annealed at a
temperature several (about 1 to 5) degrees below their melting
temperature for ten minutes to several hours and then slowly
cooled down to room temperature for several hours before
SAXS measurements.

[0177] For SAXS data analysis, the scattering data were
collected witha MAR CCD area detector and converted to 1D
scattering intensity vs. wave vector transfer, q=(42v/.) sin(6/
2), where . and 6 are the wavelength of incident X-ray and the
scattering angle, respectively. The structure factor S(q) was
calculated as I,(q)/1,(q), where 1,(q) and I, (q) are background
corrected 1D scattering intensities extracted by angular aver-

Page 88

US 2016/0176988 Al

aging of CCD images for assembled systems and un-aggre-
gated particles, respectively. The peak positions in S(q) are
determined by fitting to the Lorentzian equation.

[0178] To analyze the structure of the assembly, the peak
position ratio (Qx/Q1) from the structure factor as well as the
relative peak intensity are initially used to propose possible
structure models, and then such proposed models are com-
pared with first peak positions (q1) to calculate the nearest
neighbor particle center-to-center distances (D,.M) in the
assembly, and finally the most probable model is obtained by
comparing the D..M and the distances (D.C) calculated in
real space from the designed system configuration.

Example 9

Au and Au with Different Sizes

[0179] Thiolated DNA-capped Au nanoparticles (TA)
(functionalization methods can be found in the reports of
Nykypanchuk 2008 and Park 2008) and biotinylated DNA-
capped Au nanoparticles (SA) (the functionalization method
is similar to that of Pd nanoparticles) are used as particle
models to illustrate the phase behavior for the hybrid system
composed of Au nanoparticles with different sizes and sur-
face chemistries. FIGS. 4A, 4B, 4C, and 4D show TEM
images for the four kinds of TA with corresponding diameters
of 6.2+1 nm, 8.8+1.7 nm, 12.5+1.8 nm, and 14.7+2 nm, each
of which was used to hybridize with DNA-biotin-STV
capped Au (SA) with diameter of 16.6+1.5 nm (FIG. 4E). For
the hybrid system 9-nm TAu with 16.8-nm SAu, fourkinds of
internal spacer sets (Xa-Xb), namely, 15-3, 15-15, 35-35, and
65-65, were used, and the systems were denominated as Sys-
AAQ,, and n=18, 30, 50, and 80, respectively. For the hybrid
systems 6-nm, 12.5-nm, and 15-nm TA with 16.8 nm SA, all
the internal spacer sets (Xa-Xb) were designated as 35-35,
and the systems were accordingly nominated as Sys-AA650,
Sys-AA12,o, and Sys-AA15,,.

[0180] FIGS. 5A, 5B, SC, 5D, SE. SF, and 5G show the 2D
SAXS pattern and corresponding S(q) of the Sys-AA9,s,
Sys-AA939, Sys-AA9<5, Sys-AA9go, Sys-AA65o, Sys-
AAI2s0, and Sys-AA15so, respectively. Here, S(q)=1,(q)/1,
(q); the melting system was used for I,(q). Interestingly, the
first peak in Sys-AA9 and Sys-AA6, which contain particles
of big size difference, has weaker intensity compared with the
second one; while for Sys-AA12 and Sys-AA15 the first
peaks are always the strongest ones, which is the same as the
reported results of single component systems (Nykypanchuk
2008 and Park 2008). By fitting the 1D scattering curves from
the melting system, the size distribution of the particles in the
system can be obtained.

[0181] FIG. 5H shows the 2D SAXS pattern of the melting
Sys-AA9,, and the gray and black 1D curves correspond to
the integrated scattering intensity of melting and assembled
Sys-AA9,., respectively. The fitting of the melting curve
(FIG. 51) using the Irena 2 macros package gives two particle
size distributions with diameters of about 9 nm and about 16
nm, which confirms that the system was assembled by two
different sizes of nanoparticles. FIG. 5J shows the 2D SAXS
pattern of the melting Sys-AA15., and the fitting of the melt-
ing curve, which indicates the single size distribution due to
the similar size of the two particles in this system.

[0182] To analyze the assembled structure, first consider
Sys-AA12 and Sys-AA15, where Q,/Q,#1:V3:V7 and such
ratios correspond to a body-centered cubic (BCC) structure.
The BCC structure is expected for the hybrid system with two

Jun. 23, 2016

types of Au nanoparticles of similar size, and the result is in
coincidence with the reports of Nykypanchuk 2008 and Park
2008. For Sys-AA9,, and Sys-AA6<o, all the systems have
similar structures and Sys-AA9.,. was used to analyze their
structure. In Sys-AA9<o, Q/Q, -1:1.71:3.0:4.1:4.95:6.0;
interestingly, Q./Q.=1:1.75:2.19:2.89:3.5. Considering the
two ratios, the structure is similar to a type of face-centered
cubic (FCC) with Q,/Q, as 1:1.63:2.31:2.83:3.41 from dif-
fraction planes (111), (220), (400), (422), (531), while the
first extinction peak of (100) also appears.

[0183] Two possible structure models, similar to the crys-
talline organizations of either Cu,Au or NaTI, are proposed
for the system. The Cu,Au phase corresponds to the Pm 3 m
space group with group number 221, and Cu sits in 3c sites,
and Au sits in the 1a site. (See the schematic in FIG. 6A.) The
NaTI phase corresponds to the Fd3 m space group with group
number 227, and Na sits in 8a sites, and TI sits in 8b sites. (See
the schematic in FIG. 6C.) The scattering ability (Is) of the Au
particles used is then calculated. The Is can be roughly esti-
mated as

Ban rdlS ge pl Gen edger Va tal [Gotu Fer
outer) "Va, eo)

and o,=p*Z/M,,, where o, is the electron density of the par-
ticles, p is the material density, Z is the material atomic or
molecular electrons, and M,, is the material atomic or
molecular weight. The IS ,,..).6/IS.4,..6 and IS 4,,.6/IS4,,.9 Were
calculated as 295 and 31, respectively.

[0184] We then use an atomic system to calculate the S(q)
using software PowderCell, where Cu;Au and NaTI struc-
tures containing two atoms with an atom number ratio of 17
(~7295, resembling Sys-AA6) and 5 (~V31, resembling Sys-
AA9) were used. The same lattice constant was used to cal-
culate the S(q). The calculated S(q) for Cu,Au structure are
shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B, which correspond to atom num-
ber ratios (AR) of 17 and 5 (heavy atom at Ja site), respec-
tively. FIGS. 6C and 6D accordingly correspond the calcu-
lated S(q) for NaTI structure with AR of 17 and 5 (heavy atom
at 8a site). NaTI fits well with the experimental results. When
the particles on the Na and TI sites are the same, the NaT1
structure degenerates to a BCC structure. FIGS. 6E and 6F
show the calculated S(q) with AR of 2 and 1.5, corresponding,
to Sys-AA12 and Sys-AA15, respectively. The calculated
results show that S(q) changes into a BCC structure with the
decrease of the particle size difference. Therefore, the results
suggest that all these systems, no matter the size difference,
are actually in a NaTI structure. This structure has very
recently been reported for the assembly system of Au nano-
particles and protein particles (QB phage capsid), where the
two particles have the same size (Cigler, P., et al., Nature
Materials, 2010. 9(11): p. 918-922, which is incorporated
herein by reference in its entirety).

[0185] With the proposed NaT1 structure, D,.M in the
assembly can be calculated using Q,. For Sys-AA9,5, Sys-
AA9 59, Sys-AAI 50, SyS-AAY9 59, S¥S-AAG5, Sys-AA12, and
Sys-AA15, Q, are correspondingly 0.0177, 0.0168, 0.0144,
0.0114, 0.0141, 0.0216, and 0.0204 A’. For Sys-AA12 and
Sys-AA15, D..M=v6*2/Q, since the first peak comes from
(220) in NaTI structure, and the values are 35.6 and 37.7 nm,
respectively. For Sys-AA6 and Sys-AA9, D,,M=1.5*2/Q,
since the first peak comes from (111) in NaT] structure, and
the values are 26.6, 28.1, 32.7, 41.3, and 33.4 nm for Sys-
AAD. s, Sys-AA939, Sys-AA9so, Sys-AAIg,, and Sys-
AA6s50, respectively.

Page 89

US 2016/0176988 Al

[0186] To validate the proposed model, D,,, was estimated
using the following methods. For the configuration shown in
FIG. 3,

DCR HD cast Dep tp AX Ap Mig No

where R,, and R, correspond to the radius of particles A and.
B, T,.4.5 and T,z., correspond to the characteristic length of
X,- and X,-base ssDNA tethered on particles, and A is the
DNA shrinkage length due to hybridization (roughly related
to the X tethered base), X,,, is the hybridized base, and N, the
DNA coverage on the particles. Here, R,=4.5 nm and
R,=12.9 nm (considering STV has a diameter of 4.5 nm).
Then T was estimated by the Daoud-Cotton blob model and
the parameters used are: persistent length (1,) as 1 nm; salt
concentration (C,) as 0.14 M; and the DNA number (N,,) on.
6, 9, 12, 15, and 16.8 nm Au are 30, 65, 70, 100, and 20,
respectively. A for different X ,-X, sets was obtained from a
known BCC structure assembled by all 9-nm Au nanopar-
ticles, and we obtained A=3.8, 6.9, and 7.3 for 15-15, 35-35,
and 65-65 X ,-X,, sets, respectively. Using the above model,
the calculated D..C=25.8, 27.4, 31.1, 39.6, 30.6, 35.1, and
36.8 for Sys-AA9,., Sys-AA9,, Sys-AA9.,, Sys-AA9 9,
Sys-AA6;5, Sys-AA12 and Sys-AAIS5, respectively. The
consistent with D,.M, which confirms the proposed NaT1
structure.

[0187] These results indicate that all the Au—Au systems
where at least one of the two particles is coated with STV, no
matter the size difference, actually do have a NaTI structure.
This is the first time that this kind of structure has been
reported for bioassembled inorganic materials. This finding is
unexpected, as previous assemblies of Au particles with thi-
olated DNA were always reported to form a CsCl structure
(Nykypanchuk 2008 and Park 2008), which however, cannot
be distinguished from the NaTl structure when using Au
particles with same sizes for the assembly.

Example 10

Au and Catalytic Pd

[0188] Thiolated DNA-capped Au nanoparticles and bioti-
nylated DNA-capped Pd nanoparticles of different shapes
were used as particle models to illustrate phase behavior for
the hybrid system of Au and Pd nanoparticles. Each type of Pd
nanoparticle, including NOs, NCs, and NDs shown in FIGS.
1A through 1C, was used to hybridize with 9-nm Au nano-
particles to form Sys-POA, Sys-PCA, and Sys-PDA, respec-
tively. For both Sys-POA and Sys-PCA, the X_,-X, sets were
designed as 3-15. For Sys-PDA, the X,-X, sets were
designed as 3-15, 15-15, 35-35, and 65-65, and the systems
were nominated as Sys-PDAs, with n=18, 30, 50, and 80,
respectively.

[0189] FIGS. 7A through 7F show the 2D SAXS pattern
and corresponding S(q) of Sys-POA, Sys-PCA, Sys-PDA,,,
Sys-PDA4o, Sys-PDAso, and Sys-PDAgo, respectively. Here,
S(q)=1.(@/1,(q). 1, (q) was obtained from the control system,
which is the mixture of STV-capped Pd nanoparticles and
thiol-DNA-capped Au nanoparticles without biotinylated-
DNA. FIG. 7G gives the 2D SAXS pattern and corresponding
1,(q) for an example control system, Pd NDs and Au (PDA-
C). The control system does not show any diffraction patterns,
which indicates that the STV-Pd nanoparticles are stable and
verify the DNA-mediation role for the assembly as well. Such
Pd—Au systems show different phase behaviors with tem-
perature from the reported Au—Au systems and the above-

Jun. 23, 2016

described Au—Au with different size systems, where the
assembly becomes dissociated at the melting temperature
(M7) and show no diffraction peaks for SAXS. However, the
Pd—aAu systems still show several peaks even at tens of
degrees higher than M; determined by UV measurements.
For example, FIG. 7H gives the 2D SAXS pattern and corre-
sponding S(q) (black curve) for Sys-PDA,, at 71° C., which
shows two peaks centered at 0.0387 and 0.0795 Av. Inter-
estingly, when the system was cooled down, these two peaks
would disappear and S(q) be restored back to the original
state, as evidenced by the gray curve in FIG. 7H.

[0190] The structures of the Pd—Au system can be deter-
mined by using similar structure analysis methods as
described for the Au—Au system. All the Pd—Au systems
could have similar structures due to their similar structure
factors as shown in FIGS. 7A through 7F. Taking Sys-PDA,,
for example, Q/Q)=1:1.8:2.64:3.49, and such values
resemble the peak position ratios, which are 1:1.73:2.65:3.46,
of diffraction planes (110), (211), (321), and (422) to (110) of
a BCC structure. The Is of the Pd and Au particles is then
calculated.

B41 pa UGosu-Cermper)*V aul (CePa-Sebugo)* Val
and the Is,,,/Isp, was calculated as 0.63. According to their
similar scattering ability, the BCC structure can either be
CsCl or NaTI, but these two structures are impossible to
distinguish as stated for Sys-AA.
[0191] Using the proposed CsCl or NaTI structure, D,.M
for the Pd—Au system are calculated using Q,. For systems
shown in FIGS. 7A through 7F, the Q,’s are correspondingly
0.0340, 0.0330, 0.0330, 0.0303, 0.0248, and 0.0198 A~!, and
using D,.M=v6*z/Q,, the D,.M are correspondingly 22.6,
23.3, 23.3, 25.4, 30.9, and 38.9 nm. For the calculation of
D.C, the following parameters were used: R.,=4.5 nm for Au
nanoparticle and R,=10, 11, 11 nm (including STV) for NO,
NC, ND, respectively, DNA number on Pd nanoparticle=20;
and the other parameters are the same as that used for Au—Au
system. For the above systems, the calculated D,,C=23.2,
24.0, 24.0, 25.8, 29.6, and 38.3 nm, which agrees with the
corresponding D,.M. Not wishing to be bound by the theory,
it appears that although CsCl and NaTI structures can’t be
distinguished in the present systems, a NaTI structure is more
reasonable for such STV-capped Pd and thiol-Au system
considering the NaTI structure for STV-capped Au and thiol-
Au system.
[0192] For the melted Sys-PDA,, system (FIG. 7II), D,.M
is 16.2 nm using D,.M=2*a/Q,, since this system resembles
an amorphous structure. This value approaches that of the
distance (18.5 nm) between two DNA-capped PD particles.
Therefore, the structure of the melted system actually comes
from the aggregation of PD particles. Not wishing to be bound
by the theory, it may happen that with the dissociation of the
hybrid DNA at the melting temperature the Au particles
release from the assembly due to the high repulsive interac-
tion related to high DNA coverage, while the Pd particles in
the assembly collapse together possible reasons including
depletion interaction from DNA-Au particle, weak magnetic
interaction from Pd particles themselves, weak repulsive
interaction related to low DNA coverage, or high local con-
centration of Pd particles. However, this kind of Pd particle
aggregation is reversible and the Pd particles can re-hybridize
with Au particles to form the CsCl or NaTI structure.
[0193] The CsCl (or NaTI) structure is expected for the
system assembled from two types of spherical nanoparticle

Page 90

US 2016/0176988 Al

with similar size, as evident by reports of Nykypanchuk 2008
and Park 2008 and the above-described Au—Au system.
However, herein, three kinds of Pd polyhedrons are used to
hybridize with spherical Au, so other structures than BCC,
such as simple cubic (SC) for NC-Au and FCC for ND-Au,
are expected due to the anisotropic shape effect. The only
observed BCC phase possibly resulted from the actual loss of
the anisotropic property of Pd polyhedrons because of their
thicker capping soft molecular layers (typically 7 to 16 nm) in
comparison with their hard core size (typically 4 to 6 nm).
Such Pd—Au systems may find important applications in the
catalysis area because of the good catalytic properties of Pd
nanoparticles, unique plasmonic-related properties of Au
nanoparticles and the quite open framework of the assembled
structure.

[0194] FIG.33A (top) shows the structure factor S(q) (sym-
bols) extracted from SAXS patterns for three DH systems,
accordingly corresponding to 10 nm Au hybridized with NC
for NC Au,_,;, with NO for NO Au, |, and with ND for ND
Aug 15. The three systems show similar structures, including
similar first peak positions (q,) accordingly centered at
0.0339, 0.0333, and 0.0345 A~’; however, their correlation
length (&) depends on the particle shape and increases for
shape being more spherical-like, as shown in FIG. 33C, For
example, § increases from 37 nm to 46 and 52 nm when Pd
nanoparticles change from NC to NO and ND. To verify the
universality of this shape effect, a spherical Au—Au system
was built, Au_Au,; ,; with similar DNA design. The S(q) is
given in FIG. 33A (bottom), which indeed shows a larger € of
60 nm as well as a similar structure as Pd—Au systems. The
nature of the driving force for the Pd—Au systems was exam-
ined. A control system was created by a mixture of Au and Pd.
nanoparticles but lacking the recognition of DNA sequences.
No aggregates formed in this system, which indicates that the
STV-Pd nanoparticles are stable and also verifies the DNA-
mediation role for the assembly.

[0195] DNA flexibility is necessary for the crystallization
of DNA-Au Nanoparticles. The design of DNA witha certain
length was found to really facilitate the ordering of shaped
Pd—Au and spherical Au—Au, although the spherical sys-
tems can attain more profound ordered states than shaped
systems. Take dodecahedron Pd and Au system for example
with N from 45 to 145 in direct hybridization and N from 60
to 130 in linker hybridization systems. It was found that q,
shifted to small values with increasing the N indicating the
increase of the interparticle distances. At the same time, §
increased from 56 nm to 124 nm and then decreased to 91 nm
with N increased from 45 to 130 (ND_Au,,,, with S(q)
displayed in the middle panel of FIG. 33B) and 145. In con-
trast, the spherical Au—Au reach a well ordered state for N as
90 with § of 310 nm, and this system is denoted by Au_Au,, 39,
which S(q) is displayed in the bottom panel of FIG. 33B.

[0196] Using the CsC1 lattice, the experimental S(q) can be
fitted well, especially for Au_Au,3o, as shown by black solid
lines in FIGS. 33A and 33B. Due to the similar form factors
(AP(q)) for 10 nm Au and 11 nm Pd nanoparticles, such
binary CsCl lattices actually show BCC patterns with first
peak from (110), which is the same as single component Au
systems. One way to confirm this type of lattice is to adjust the
AP(q), and thus a SC pattern with (100) as first peak will
display. Other systems comprising components with distinct
form factors were also constructed. Au size was increased
from 10 nm to 15 nm and 20 nm while keeping ND nanopar-
ticle size unchanged. FIG. 33B (top) shows S(q) for two

Jun. 23, 2016

representative systems for ND with 15 nm Au nanoparticles
and ND with 20 nm Au nanoparticles. In comparison with
systems for ND and 10 nm Au, a weak peak with q centered
at 1/21/72 of the original first peak gradually emerges with
increase Au nanoparticle size. This peak was assigned as
(100) peak from a SC structure. Therefore, above all, the Pd
and Au Nanoparticles formed a CsC] superlattice, as sche-
matically shown in FIG. 33C (insert). Distinct from the
expected NaCl or FCC-like phase, the only observed CsCl
lattice could be resulted from the effective shape transforma-
tion from anisotropic to isotropic shape due to the thick cap-
ping soft molecular layers. The spherical-like particle favors
such shape transformation, and thus favors the CsCl lattices
because they are the stable structures for spherical binary
DNA nanoparticles.

[0197] Based on the CsCl structure, the nearest neighbor
particle surface-to-surface distance (D,,) for ND-Au systems
was calculated. FIG. 33D summarizes the D,, for the ND and
10nm Au systems, which displays a range from ~12 to 30 nm.
While the interparticle distances can be regulated by the
change of ionic strength, it can also be achieved by varying
the DNA length. The established DNA structure medel allows
us to predict the D,,. A Daoud-Cotton (DC) blob model anda
worm-like chain (WLC) model were used to calculate the
tethered DNA thickness and linker length, respectively. FIG.
33D shows that the model distances agree well with the
experimental data, especially for systems with shorter length
DNA, and the accuracy is limited in ~12%. Such Pd—Au
systems could be attractive for optical and catalytic-related
studies due to the intrinsic merits of Pd and Au nanoparticles,
possible energy transfer between them, and the quite open
framework of the assembled structure.

Example 11

Au and Fluorescent QD

[0198] First take 9.0-nm thiolated DNA-capped Au nano-
particles and biotinylated DNA-capped QD with an emission
wavelength centered at 705 nm (denoted Q7) as an example to
illustrate the phase behavior for the hybrid system of Au and
QD nanoparticles. The systems were obtained by mixing
DNA-Au with biotin-DNA first and then with STV-QD, and
the mole ratio of QD to Au and biotin-DNA is 1:1:40. The size
and shape of the QD was characterized by TEM and SAXS.
FIG. 8A shows the TEM images of Q7, where the QD has an
elongated shape. The size distribution histogram of Q7 gives
the long axis length and short axis length as 14+2.5 nm and
621.5 nm, respectively. FIG. 8B shows the 1,(q), the fitting,
and size distribution for Q7. The fitting gives two size distri-
butions, 1321.5 nm and 6.1™1.1 nm, which accordingly
corresponds to the long and short axis of Q7. For this hybrid
system, the X_,-X, sets were designated as 0-15, 3-15, 15-15,
35-35, and 65-65, and the systems were denominated as Sys-
Q7A,, with n=15, 18, 30, 50, and 80, respectively.

[0199] FIGS. 9A through 9E give the 2D SAXS pattern and
corresponding S(q) for Sys-Q7A,,, and the images 9A through
9E corresponds to n=15, 18, 30, 50, and 80, respectively.
Here, S(q)-1,(@)/,(q), 1,(q) was obtained from either the
control system or the melting system. The S(q) shows that the
first peak intensity is weaker than the second one for all the
system, and becomes much weaker for longer DNA spacer.
The control system is the mixture of STV-capped QD and
Thiol-DNA capped Au nanoparticles without biotinylated-
DNA. FIG. 9F gives the 2D SAXS pattern and its correspond-

Page 91

US 2016/0176988 Al

ing L(@) for a control system of Q7 and Au (Q7A-C), which
does not show any diffraction patterns.

[0200] To investigate the temperature-dependent phase
behavior, Sys-Q7A3, without pre-annealing was selected as
an instance and the results are shown in FIG. 10. The as-
assembled system without annealing does not show a long-
range ordered structure, as demonstrated by the broad rings in
2D pattern and the broad and few diffraction peaks of the
structure factor. This Sys-Q7A,, can be crystallized by
annealing at 48° C. (about 10° C. below the M,) for about 20
min. Upon further increasing temperature to 59° C., no struc-
ture was found, which means Q7 and Au nanoparticles can be
re-dispersed in the solution after DNA de-hybridization. To
investigate the thermal stability of STV on the QD surface,
the system was further heated to 75° C. and kept at tempera-
ture for | hour. After cooling down to 26° C., the system again
showed crystallization, which indicates the high thermal sta-
bility of capped STV. Such phase behavior is similar to the
reported Au—Au systems and the above-described systems
of Au—Au with different particle sizes.

[0201] The effects of biotin-DNA number (N) and particle
ratio on the assembly phase behavior were also investigated.
First the biotin-DNA number was changed while the mole
ratio of QD to Au was maintained at 1:1. FIGS. 11A and 11B
show the 2D SAXS pattern and corresponding S(q) for Sys-
Q7Agp With the mole ratio of biotin-DNA to Q7 (Au) as N=10
and 120, respectively. Compared with the structure factors of
systems for N=10, 40 (FIG. 9C), and 120, one can conclude
that a certain amount of biotin-DNA, at least ten times the Au
particle amount, is required for good crystallization, but
excess biotin-DNA seems not to frustrate the crystallization
of the QD-Au system. Then the particle ratio was altered and
the ratio of QD:Au:biotin-DNA was set at 1:2:80, 2:1:40,
10:1:20. After assembly, there were no visible particles in the
supernatant for any of the above systems except the system
with QD: Au:biotin-DNA as 10:1:20, which contains QD as
easily observed by a UV lamp. The 2D SAXS patterns and
S(q) corresponding to the above three systems are shown in
FIGS. 11C and 11D. It was found that all the systems (pre-
annealed) show similar structure factors and the particle
ratios in this studied range don’t have important effects on the
structure. Therefore, as long as the QD and Au systems crys-
tallize after annealing, they actually show the same structure,
which may be in a global energy minimum state and thus
independent of the initial state and assembly pathway.
[0202] To analyze the assembly structure, the peak position
ratios were calculated. Since all the systems show the same
structure, Sys-Q7A,, was taken as the example. For this sys-
tem, Q./Q,=1:1.36:2:2.63:3.19:3.9:4.8, and such values
resemble the peak position ratios, which are 1:1.41:2:2.65:3.
19:3.87:4.79, of diffraction planes (110), (200), (220), (321),
(420), (521), (611) to (110) of a BCC structure. The relative
scattering ability of Au to Q7 (Is,,/Isg;) was calculated as
~18. Supposing the assembly has a CsCI structure, the calcu-
lated results by the method used for Pd—Au system show that
this system displays its intrinsic SC diffraction pattern. The
relative peak intensity of (100) to (110) is about 0.4, and so the
first diffraction peak should be (100) and the peaks with
Q/Q, at 2.63, 3.9, and 4.8 should never appear, which con-
tradicted the observed results. Therefore, either QD or Au
should pack in a BCC structure, and the other one sit on some
sites of this BCC frame.

[0203] Considering the relative intensity of (110) and (200)
(utoyT(200)), a BCC with a sub-SC structure is proposed,

Jun. 23, 2016

where one kind of particle sits on BCC sites and combines
with another type of particle to form an SC subunit. Such
structure is a cubic La,O,-like structure (the high temperature
X-phase described in Aldebert, P., et al., (Journal De Phy-
sique, 1979, 40(10): p. 1005-1012, which is incorporated
herein by reference in its entirety), which corresponds to the
Im 3 m space group with group number 229.

[0204] In this prototype structure, La sits in 2a sites, and O
is randomly distributed over the 6b sites with a 50% probabil-
ity that any one site is occupied. For an A-B particle system
with this structure, and suppose particle A sits on 2a sites and
B on 6b sites, the Is ,/Isy-dependent diffraction behavior is
calculated by PowderCell and the results are shown in FIG.
11F, where the two numbers correspond to A and B atom
number and the square of their ratio is roughly equal to
Is ,/Is. When Is,,>>Isg, this structure shows a BCC diffrac-
tion pattern and the first peak is from (110) and has the
strongest intensity. The 1,,;oyIjooq) decreases with the
decrease of Is ,/Isz; when Is ,=Isz, this structure shows a SC
diffraction pattern and I,, 19) becomes 0 while 299) becomes
strongest. With the further decrease of Is ,/Is;, I(, 19) increases
and T.10)/T,200) becomes ~0.4 when Is <<Isz. According to
the calculated results and Is ,,/Isg;, the Sys-Q7A corresponds
to the case 80:20 in FIG. 11F, and Au and QD particles are on
2a and 6b sites, respectively. The Iq 10)/T2o0) of Sys-Q7A for
short DNA spacers agrees with the calculated results, while
this value decreases with spacer length and deviates from the
calculated results. This spacer length-dependent intensity
change may be related to the decreased correlation length
with the increase of spacer length, which leads to diffraction
(200) from subunit lattice stronger but (110) from unit lattice
weaker. The proposed structure is also shown in FIG. 11F,
where the QD was proposed to link two Au particles through
its short axis direction since it can maximize the hybrid DNA
number in this way.

[0205] Using the proposed La,O, structure, D,.M for Sys-
Q7Aare calculated using Q,. For systems shown in FIGS. 9A.
through 9F, Q, are correspondingly 0.0230, 0.0223, 0.0201,
0.0152, and 0.0116 A~', and using D,.M=¥2*7/Q, , the D,.M
are correspondingly 19.3, 19.9, 22.1, 29.2, and 38.3 nm. For
the calculation of D.C, the following parameters were used:
R,,=4.5 nm, Ro75=7.5 nm (including STV), DNA number on
Q7-20, and the other parameters are the same as that used for
the Au—Au system. The calculated D,.C for the above sys-
tems is accordingly as 20.5, 21.1, 23.2, 27.5, and 36.3 nm,
which agrees with the D..M.

[0206] Two other kinds of QD with emission wavelengths
centered at 605 nm (Q6) and 525 nm (Q5) were used to
hybridize with Au nanoparticles. FIGS. 8C and 8D show the
1,(q), the fitting, and the size distribution for Q6 and QS,
respectively. The fitting results show that 06 and Q5 also have
elongated shape, and the long and short axis length are 1] nm
and 5 nm for Q6, and 7 nm and 3 nm for QS. Q6 and Q5 were
accordingly hybridized with 9-nm Au nanoparticles to form
Sys-QA6 and Sys-QAS, and the X_,-Xz, sets were designated
as 0-15, 15-15, 35-35, and 65-65, and the systems were
denominated as Sys-QA6,, and Sys-QAS,, and n=15, 30, 50,
and 80, respectively. FIGS. 12A through 12H give the 2D
SAXS pattern and corresponding S(q) for Sys-QA6, and Sys-
QAS,, and the images in FIGS. 12A through 12D and 12E
through 12H correspond ton=15, 30, 50, and 80, respectively.
All the systems were proposed to be La,O; structure due to

Page 92

US 2016/0176988 Al

their similar S(q) to Sys-Q7A. With the decrease of QD size
for QD-Au system, the Iq 1oy/I(200) increases, which agrees
with he calculated S(q).

[0207] The Sys-QA6 and Sys-QA5 also have spacer
Jength-dependent intensity change behavior. Q, was used to
calculate the DM. For Sys-QA6, Q, are 0.0238, 0.0209,
0.0182, and 0.01490 A~!, corresponding to n=15, 30, 50, and
80, respectively, and D,,.M are correspondingly 18.6, 21.2,
24.3, and 29.6 nm. For Sys-QA5, Q, are 0.0245, 0.0205,
0.0187, and 0.0138 A~', corresponding to n=15, 30, 50, and
80, respectively, and D..M are correspondingly 18.1, 21.6,
23.7, and 32.1 nm. For the calculation of D.C, the following
parameters were used: R ,,=4.5 nm; Ry,s=6.5 nm (including
STV); Rgss=5.5 nm (including STV); DNA number on Q6 or
Q5 is 20; and the other parameters are the same as that used
for the Au—Au system. The calculated D.C for Sys-QA6,,
are 19,8, 22.5, 26.6, and 35.6 nm for n=15, 30, 50 and 80, and
for Sys-QA5 are 19.1, 21.9, 26.2, and 35.3 nm for n=15, 30,
50 and 80, respectively. D.C agrees with the D..M, espe-
cially for the short DNA spacer case.

[0208] The Au size effect on the Au-QD assembly structure
was also investigated. Here, a system was constructed by
assembling 16.6-nm STV-Au and Q7 and the X,-X,, sets
were designed as 15-15 and the system was denoted as Sys-
Q7A16;,. FIGS. 134 and 13B show the 2D SAXS pattern
and corresponding S(q) at 26° C. and 53° C., and FIG. 13C
shows the 2D SAXS pattern, its 1,(q), and the fitting at 71°C.
for the melting system. The Q/Q, for this system at 53°C. is
1:1.73:2.38:3.2:3.92, and can be assigned to a BCC structure,
which corresponds the case ~80:1 in FIG. 11F. So this system
also has a cubic La,O,-like structure.

[0209] Therefore, these results show that all the hybrid
systems of QD and Au have cubic La,O,-like structures, and
this is the first time that this kind of structure has been
reported for bioassembled materials. Without wishing to be
bound by the theory, it is considered that the elongated shape
of QD is important for the formation of this novel structure,
and we predict that other nanoparticles with similar shapes
might result in the creation of similar assemblies.

[0210] The photoluminescence properties of the Au-QD
systems were also measured. Take Sys-Q7A for the example.
FIG. 14A shows the photoluminescence of Sys-Q7A,,
including the control system, with n=15, 30, 50, and 80 sys-
tems. It can be seen that the Au-QD systems show a distance-
dependent fluorescence quenching behavior. The quenching
efficiency (QE) of Sys-Q7A against the surface-to-surface
distance between the QD and Au is given in FIG. 14B. The
decay curve can be fitted by an exponential decay model
where QE=QE, ‘exp (-d/d,) (see, e.g., Zheng, W. M. and L.
He, Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2010. 114(41): p.
17829-17835, which is incorporated herein by reference in its
entirety), where QE, is the quenching efficiency when QD
were directly attached to the Au surface, dy is the distance
constant within which fluorescence quenching occurs, and d
the separating distance between the QD and Au surfaces. The
fitting yielded an equation of QE=1.14-exp (-d/15.3), and the
fitted do agrees with the experimental values obtained by
Zheng (2010).

Example 12

Au and Magnetic Iron Oxide Particles

[0211] About 9 nm thiolated DNA-capped Au nanopar-
ticles and biotinylated DNA-capped IO nanoparticles were

Jun. 23, 2016

used as particle models to illustrate phase behavior for the
hybrid system of Au and IO nanoparticles. The size and shape
of the JO were characterized by TEM and SAXS. FIG. 15A.
shows the TEM image, FIG. 15B the SAXS 1,(q) and FIG.
15C the fitting of 1, which indicate that the IO have spherical
shapes with diameters of 10.2+0.7 nm. For the Au and IO
hybrid system, the ratio of IO to Au and biotin-DNA was set
as 1:1:15, and the X,,-X,, sets were designed as 0-15, 15-15,
35-35, and 65-65, and the systems were nominated as Sys-
JA,,, with n=15, 30, 50, and 80, respectively.

[0212] FIGS. 16A through 16D give the 2D SAXS pattern
and corresponding S(q) for Sys-IA,,, and the images in FIGS.
16A through 16D correspond to n=15, 30, 50, and 80, respec-
tively. Here, S(q)=1,(qV/I,(q), 1,(q) was obtained from the
melting system of Sys-1A3). Two control systems (ICA-I and
TAC-II) were designed, and IAC-I is the mixture of STV-IO
and Au particles without biotin-DNA, and IAC-II is the mix-
ture of STV-IO and biotin-DNA without Au particles. FIGS.
16E and 16F give the 2D SAXS pattern and corresponding
S(q) for IAC-I and IAC-II, respectively. Both the control
systems have aggregations and show similar S(q) and three
peaks near about 0.033, 0.059, 0.102 A~!, which indicates
that this structure actually comes from JO-IO aggregation.
Such aggregation may be induced by the depletion attraction
by biotin-DNA or DNA-Au particles because STV-IO
doesn’t form aggregates in solution as shown in FIG. 15A.
Interestingly. these three peaks from IO disappear for short
DNA spacers, such as n=15 and 30, but not for long DNA
spacers like n=50 and 80. This result indicates that the DNA
with shorter spacer has higher hybrid energy and thus can
break the 1O-IO aggregation to form IO-Au aggregation.
Therefore, the Sys-IA consists of only IO-Au aggregation for
short DNA spacers (n=15, 30), but IO-IO and IO-Au aggre-
gation for long DNA spacers (n=50, 80).

[0213] The temperature-dependent phase behavior of Sys-
IO was investigated. We found that Sys-IO showed different
behavior, which depended on the spacer length. FIGS. 174
and 17B show the S(q) as a function of temperature for
Sys-1A,. and Sys-IAso, respectively. For Sys-IA39, when this
system is heated to 55° C., all the diffraction peaks disappear,
which means IO and Au nanoparticles in this system can be
re-dispersed in the solution after DNA de-hybridization.
After cooling down the system, IO-Au hybrid structures form
again, but it will take a long time (days) to form better struc-
tures. It should be noted that if the system is kept in the
melting state (55° C.) for hours, the IO-IO aggregation will
form and the aggregation has a structure similar to that shown
in FIGS. 16E and 16F. But such IO-IO aggregation will even-
tually convert back into a 1O-Au structure when the system
cooled down. However, for Sys-IA,,, when this system is
melted, only its first original peak disappears and the other
peaks with Q at ~0.033, 0.059, 0.102 A-', which are the same
peaks in 1O-IO aggregation, still exist. This result again
shows that Sys-IA;, actually consists of two kinds of aggre-
gations, namely, [0-IO and Au-IO, and also indicates that the
kinds of 10-10 interaction are not related to the specific DNA
hybridization.

[0214] The effects of biotin-DNA number (N) and particle
ratio on the assembly phase behavior were investigated. First
the biotin-DNA number was changed while the mole ratio of
IO to Au was kept at 1:1. FIGS. 184 and 18B show the 2D
SAXS pattern and corresponding S(q) for Sys-IA3, with the
mole ratio of biotin-DNA to IO (Au) as N=7 and 60, respec-
tively. Compared with the structure factors of systems for

Page 93

US 2016/0176988 Al

N=15 (FIG. 16A) and the control system, one can conclude
that an appropriate amount of biotin-DNA is required to break
down the IO-IO aggregation and to form the IO and Au
assembly. In the case of too little biotin-DNA it doesn’t pro-
vide enough driving force for 1O and Au assembly; while for
too much biotin-DNA it may introduce excess depletion
attraction that makes IO-IO aggregation uneasily broken as
well. Then the particle ratio was changed and IO:Au:biotin-
DNA was set to 1:5:75 and 5:1:75. The 2D SAXS patterns and
S(q) corresponding to the two systems are given in FIGS. 17C
and 17D, and the results indicate that less IO than Au is not
favorable for IO-Au assembly. This may be caused by the
blocking of the IO surface DNA by excess Au particles due to
the lower DNA coverage on IO (~10 DNA on 10-nm IO).

[0215] A linker DNA was used to assemble STV-IO capped
with biotin-DNA and Au particle capped with thiol-DNA. A
linker system was designed as illustrated in FIG. 19, and the
L,, spacer was designed as different number of poly T and the
system was nominated as Sys-[AL,,. FIGS. 20A through 20D.
show the 2D SAXS pattern and corresponding S(q) for Sys-
TAL,,, and the images in FIGS. 20A through 20D correspond
to n=0, 30, 70, and 170, respectively. Compared with the
10-10 structure, the Sys-IAL shows peaks all coming from
JO-Au aggregation for short DNA linkers (n-0), and shows
peaks both coming from IO-IO and JO-Au for long DNA
linkers (n=30, 70, 170). The linker system also shows similar
temperature-dependent phase behavior to the direct hybrid
system, namely, peaks from IO-Au rather than 1O-IO aggre-
gation disappear above melting temperature.

[0216] To analyze the assembly structure, the peak position
ratios were calculated. Only systems displaying Au-IO peaks,
such as Sys-IA,;, Sys-1A3o, and Sys-LALo, were used to
calculate Q,/Q,, and the ratio obtained was 1:1.7~1.8:2.3~2.
5. A similar ratio was also obtained from other systems if the
peaks from IO-IO were subtracted. According to the Q,/Q,,
the structure may be SC with Q/Q, as 1:1.73:2.45 from
diffraction planes (100), (111), (211), or BCC with Q/Q, as
1:1.73:2.45 from diffraction planes (110), (211), (222), or
FCC with Q/Q, as 1:1.63:2.31:2.52 from diffraction planes
(111), (220), (400), (331). For a binary SC system, the struc-
ture model can be CsCl, a-ReO3, or AuCu; fora binary BCC
system, the structure model can be La,O,; for a binary FCC
system, the structure model can be NaTl, NaCl, ZnS
(zincblende), or CaF,. The Is4,/Is7o is calculated as 2.6 for
Sys-Au-IO, and the proposed structure for CsCl, a-ReO,,
AuCu;, La,O;, NaTl, NaCl, ZnS and CaF, with the corre-
sponding calculated S(q) is accordingly shown in FIGS. 21A.
through 21H, respectively. The models, including CsCl with
Q, from (110), AuCu, with Q, from (111), NaTI withQ, from
(220), and ZnS with Q, from (111), seem possible in com-
parison of their relative peak intensity with experimental
results. The D,.M can be calculated as V6*/Q,, V6*/Q,,
V6*W/Q,, and 1.5*2/Q,, for CsCl, AuCu,, NaTl, and ZnS,
respectively. For Sys-IA,,, Q, are 0.0246, 0.023, 0.018, and
0.0138 Av, corresponding to n=15, 30, 50, and 80, respec-
tively, and D..M are correspondingly 31.3, 33.5, 42.8, and
$5.8 nm for the CsCl, AuCu,, and NaT] models, and 19.2,
20.5, 26.2, and 34.1 nm for the ZnS model. For Sys-IAL,,, Q;
are 0.0213, 0.0177, 0.0156, and 0.015 A~!, corresponding to
n=O, 30, 70, and 170, respectively, and D.,.M are correspond-
ingly 36.1, 43.5, 49.3, and 51.3 nm for the CsCl, AuCus, and
NaTI models, and 22.1, 26.6, 30.2, and 31.4 nm for the ZnS
model.

Jun. 23, 2016

[0217] To calculate the D.C for Sys-IA,, the following
parameters were used: R.,,, 4.5 nm; R,9=9.5 nm (including
STV); DNA number on JO=10; and the other parameters are
the same as that used for the Au—Au system. The calculated
D.C for the Sys-LA,, is 21.7, 23.7, 27.2, and 35.4 nm, corre-
sponding to n=15, 30, 50, and 80, respectively. D.C agrees
with the D,.M of ZnS model. Therefore, our results show that
all the hybrid systems of IO and Au have zincblende struc-
tures, and this is the first time that this kind of structure has
been reported for bioassembled materials.

[0218] The magnetic field (B) effects on the phase behavior
of the IO-Au hybrid systems were measured. Take Sys-IA39
(a system having only IO and Au aggregation) and sys-
1AL130 (a system containing a mixture of IO and Au aggre-
gation and IO and 10 aggregation system) for examples to
illustrate such B effects. FIGS. 22A and 22B accordingly
show the magnetic field-dependent 2D SAXS pattern and
corresponding S(q) for Sys-IA,, and Sys-IAL, 3. For Sys-
TA3o with the increase of B, the third diffraction peak (331) of
ZnS structure first disappears, and then the second peak (220)
disappears, and finally only the first peak (111) survives at the
highest B in this study. Interestingly, both the second and third
peaks appear again after the removal of B, which indicates the
B-dependent phase behavior is reversible. The sys-[AL, 3
also shows a reversible B-dependent phase behavior. With the
increase of B, the first peak (111) from IO-Au aggregation
disappears, while the other peaks from IO-IO aggregation
remain nearly constant. Such a change law of S(q) with B is
similar to that of S(q) with T. For the above two systems, the
first peak position nearly remains constant but its width
becomes much broader with the increase of B, which indi-
cates that the mean particle distance remains unchanged but
the particles’ position fluctuation increases. Such position
fluctuation with B is related to the DNA stiffness. In compari-
son with Sys-IA,o, Sys-IAL,39 is easier to subject to this
fluctuation due to its longer and more flexible DNA linker,
and this leads to the loss of the first peak of Sys IAL, 3, while
not of Sys-IA3, at the same B.

Example 13

Au and Magnetic Iron Oxide Particles

[0219] In these systems, besides the DNA specific interac-
tions between IO and Au, there are remarkable non-specific
interactions, such as weak magnetic attraction and van der
Waals interaction related to the limited DNA number,
between IO nanoparticles. The assembly rules should be dif-
ferent from the Au—Au and Au—Pd systems. Moreover, a
route with controllable interplay between the specific and
non-specific interactions is promising for switchable struc-
tures. It was found that DNA-capped IO were ready to form
aggregates. The S(q) is given in FIG. 34A (1), which corre-
sponds to asystem, denoted by Sys-FeO, containing IO nano-
particles capped with one type of 30-base biotinylated-DNA.
The spectrum, denoted by Phase-F, shows two broad peaks
centered at 0.033 and 0.059 A~", respectively. This phase was
assigned as a weak-ordered FCC structure, as indicated by the
fit shown as black line in FIG. 34A (1). The Phase-F was
triggered by the non-specific interactions, as evidenced by the
temperature-dependent study, which displayed an absence of
thermal dissociation process for such aggregates.

[0220] Interestingly, these non-specific interaction induced
aggregates can switch into a binary component superlattice
directed by DNA hybridization. FIG. 34A (2) shows a DNA

Page 94

US 2016/0176988 Al

length-dependent structure evolution of Phase-F by introduc-
ing direct complementary Au nanoparticles. In these direct
hybridization systems, with N decrease from 145 to 85, 45,
and 30, a new phase emerges accompanied by the consump-
tion of the initial Phase-F. However, distinct from Phase-F,
this new phase revealed a thermally reversible dissociation-
association behavior, indicating that it was indeed a DNA-
driven assembly by IO and Au nanoparticles. This new phase
was denoted by Phase-D. The longer spacer systems for
N=145 (FeO_Augs ¢5) and 70 (FeO_Au,; 35) show a mix-
ture phase-F and D, while shorter ones for N=45 (FeO_Au,,
15)and30(FeO_Au, ,;) show a pure phase-D as well as with
improved structure order. This behavior is distinct from
Pd—Au systems and Au—Au systems, where longer DNA
favors better structure. This DNA-length dependent structure
evolution seems universal for IO-Au systems and is also
observed in the linker hybridization systems, which demon-
strates that the longer linkers (N=90, 130, 190, and 230)
produce a mixture phase of JO and IA, and shorter linker
(N=60) gives the pure phase-D. Moreover, this binary IO and
Au phase can transform back into IO phase by decreasing the
DNA attraction forces. For example, upon keeping the
Phase-D at T,, (typically ~55° C.) for hours rather than cool-
ing directly to room temperature, the Phase-F will form
although this phase can eventually transformed into pure
Phase-D if cooling down this system. Therefore, a switchable
phase transition between different-component phases can be
realized with the regulation of interplay between non-specific
and specific interactions.

[0221] To further elaborate the DNA length effects on the
phase switch behavior, the assembly kinetics of the two
phases were analyzed upon introducing complementary Au
nanoparticles into Phase-F. Two representative systems were
investigated, including FeO_Au,, ,; for assembly of pure
Phase-FA and FeO_Au,; 3; for assembly of mixed Phase-F
and -D. Based on the time-dependent development of SAXS
patterns, the § of the two phases was derived and plotted in
FIG. 34C. In comparison with longer spacer system, the
shorter one demonstrates a short time-scale for the develop-
ment of Phase-D and a complete elapse of Phase-F at ~40 h.
The slower kinetics and smaller € for longer spacer system
might be caused by the lower penetration capability into the
Phase-F due to the higher entropic penalty, their lower effec-
tive DNA hybridization concentration, and the higher posi-
tional fluctuation due to more soft repulsive potentials.

[0222] Structural analysis suggested Phase-D with an Au
nanoparticles-based FCC structure, where only Au nanopar-
ticles show positional order. Compared with other types of
possible lattices, such as CsCl, such FCC structure gives the
best fit, as given by black solid line in FIG. 34A (2) for
FeO_Auy ,;- Due to the limited number of STV on the IO
nanoparticles surface, the investigation of systems compris-
ing Au and STV is helpful to understand the Phase-D struc-
ture. Two systems, namely STV_Au,; ,; and STV_Auy 5
were constructed, and their S(q) are given in FIG. 34A (3).
Interestingly, the STV_Au,; ;; shows similar S(q) as phase-
D, and meanwhile the similar fit quality was exhibited using
the Au nanoparticles-based FCC structure. Different from
FeO_Auy ,5, the STV_Au, ,; could achieve a highly ordered
state, which can be well fitted by such FCC structure. Above
all, it’s reasonable to such structure as a FCC for Au nano-
particles, which are surrounded by STV for STV-Au or IO for
JO-Au as linker shells. The 3D and 2D schematics are illus-
trated FIGS. 34B and 34C, respectively.

Jun. 23, 2016

[0223] Based on this FCC structure, the D,, for IO-Au DH
systems was calculated and plotted as black spherical sym-
bols in FIG. 34D. As the DC-model is applicable for the
Au—Au and Pd—Au systems, it was also adopted to calcu-
late D,,. Due to the linker roles for IO connecting two Au
Nanoparticles, there could be variable angle (a), which
formed between two adjacent Au-IO connections, as shown
in FIG. 34D. Interestingly, it was found that D,, data fell in the
calculations with a between 180° (upper straight line in FIG.
34D) and 109° (lower straight line in FIG. 34D). We then
calculated a and gave the values in FIG. 3¢, which showed
that a changes from ~170° to 109° with the increase of N from
45 to 145. This result implies that the IO shifts its position
from a two Au Nanoparticles center to a three Au Nanopar-
ticles (triangle) center or to a four Au Nanoparticles (tetrahe-
dron) center with the increase of spacer number.

[0224] The magnetic response for JO-Au systems was also
investigated. By changing the sample-magnet distance as
shown in FIG. 34H, the magnetic field (B)-dependent
response of two representative IO-Au systems were mea-
sured, namely, FeO_Au,, ,; (Phase-D) and FeO_Au, 39
(mixed Phase-F and -D). For FeQ_Au,; ,s, the diffraction
peaks became broader and even disappeared with B. The q;
disappears for B at 0.11 T, and further increase of B to 0.16 T
leads to the diminished q, and the residue of q,. FeO Au; 39
shows a more profound B-response for Phase-FA and an inert
response for Phase-F. That is q, from Phase-D disappears for
B at 0.16 T and other peaks from Phase-F display subtle
changes. The S(q) can convert back to the initial states for the
both systems, indicating a reversible B response. The softer
potential from longer DNA and lower hybridization effi-
ciency might be responsible for the more responsive behavior
of FeO_Au, 30 system. This result suggested that through
rational DNA design, one can fabricate systems with B-re-
sponse switchable superlattice of different states, which
could be interesting for smart responsive materials.

Example 14

Au and Protein (Streptavidin)

[0225] Nine-nm thiolated DNA-capped Au nanoparticles
were used to hybridize with streptavidin (STV). The ratio of
STV to Au and biotin-DNA was set as 1:20:100, and the
X,-Xz sets were designed as 0-15, 3-15, 15-15, and 35-35,
and the systems were nominated as Sys-SA,,, with n=15, 18,
30, and 50, respectively.

[0226] FIGS. 23A through 23D give the 2D SAXS pattern
and corresponding S(q) for Sys-SA,,, and the images in FIGS.
23A through 23D correspond to n=15, 18, 30, and 50, respec-
tively. Here, S(q)=1,(qy/1,(q), 1,(q) was obtained from the
melting system. The Q./Q, were calculated as 1:(1.69~1.78):
(2.3~2.5):(2.7~2.8):(3.1~3.2). According to the Q,/Q,, the
structure can be SC with Q/Q, as 1:1.73:2.45:2.83:3.16 from
diffraction planes (100), (111), (211), (220), and (310) or
BCC with Q/Q, as 1:1.73:2.45:2.83:3.16 from diffraction
planes (110), (211), (222), (400), and (420) or FCC with
Q,/Q; as 1:1.63:2.31:2.52:2.83:3.26 from diffraction planes
(111), (220), (400), (331), (422), and (440). For a binary SC
system, the structure model can be CsCl, a-ReOs, or AuCu;
for a binary BCC system, the structure model can be La,O,;
for a binary FCC system, the structure model can be NaTI,
NaCl, ZnS (zincblende), or CaF. The Isy,/Issyy is roughly
considered as 0, and according to the calculated results the
possible models are La,O, NaCl, ZnS, and CaF,. The D,.M

Page 95

US 2016/0176988 Al

can be calculated as V2*1/Q,, V3*/Q,, V1.5*7/Q,, and
1.5*1/Q, for La,O, NaCl, ZnS, and CaF, respectively. For
Sys-SA,,, Q; are 0.0288, 0.0273, 0.0246, and 0.0225 Av},
corresponding to n=15, 18, 30, and 50, respectively, and
D,.M are correspondingly 15.4, 16.3, 18.1, and 21.2 nm for
the La,O, models, 18.9, 19.9, 22.1, and 25.9 nm for the NaCl
model, and 16.4, 17.3, 19.2, and 22.4 nm for the ZnS and
CaF, models.
[0227] To calculate the D_.C for Sys-SA,, the following
parameters were used: R,,=4.5 nm, Rg-,=3 nm (including
STV), DNA number on STV=4, and the other parameters are
the same as that used for the Au—Au system. The calculated
C for Sys-IA,, is 15.9, 16.4, 18.1, and 21.6 nm, corre-
sponding to n=15, 18, 30, and SO, respectively. D,.C agrees
with the D,.M of the La,0;, ZnS and CaF, models. Since
STV doesn’t give sufficient scattering, the precise location of
the organic compound of the assembly can’t be predicted, and
the predicted La,O,, ZnS and CaF, structures are based on the
positions of the Au particles. However, considering STV has
four binding sites for biotin, the most likely model is the
CaF,-like crystalline organization.

Example 15

QD and QD

[0228] STV-Q7 was used to hybridize with STV-Q7 and
STV-Q5 to form Sys-Q77 and Sys-Q75 systems, respectively.
The ratio of QD to QD and biotin-DNA was set as 1:1:40, and
the X,-X,, sets were designed as 3-3, 0-15, and 15-15 for
Sys-Q77, and the systems were denoted Sys-Q77,, with n=3,
15, and 30, respectively. The X,-X, sets were designed as
3-3, 15-15, and 35-35 for Sys-Q75, and the systems were
denoted Sys-Q75,,, with n=3, 30, and 50, respectively.
[0229] FIGS. 24A through 24F give the 2D SAXS pattern
and corresponding S(q) for Sys-Q77,, and Sys-Q75,, and the
images in FIGS. 24A through 24C correspond to n=3, 15, and
30 for Sys-Q77,,, and the images in FIGS. 24D through 24F
correspond to n=3, 30, and 50 for Sys-Q75,,, respectively.
Here, S(q)=1,(qV1,(q), 1,(q) was obtained from the corre-
sponding melting system. The Q,/Q, were calculated as 1:(1.
76~1.85):(2.65~2.73):(~3.4). According to the Q/Q,, and
the above analysis for Au—Au and Pd—Au systems, the
structure can be either the CsCl or the NaTI structure. The
D,.M for these two structure can be calculated as V6*2/Q,.
For Sys-Q77,,, Q; are 0.0288, 0.0282, and 0.0258 A-’, cor-
responding to n=3, 15, and 30, respectively, and D..M are
correspondingly 26.7, 27.2, and 29.8 nm. For Sys-Q75,,, Q;
are 0.0312, 0.0258, and 0.0234 A7!, corresponding to n=3,
30, and 50, respectively, and D,,.M are correspondingly 24.7,
29.8, and 32.9 nm.

[0230] To calculate the D,.C for Sys-QD,,, the following
parameters were used: Rg7=12 nm (long axis size including
STV), Rgs=10 nm (long axis size including STV), DNA
number on QD=20, and the other parameters are the same as
that used for the Au—Au system. The calculated D.C for the
Sys-Q75, is 25.1, 29.1, and 32.1 forn=3, 15, and 30, respec-
tively, and for the Sys-Q77, is 26.8, 28.2, and 30.6 forn=3, 30,
and 50, respectively. D.C agrees with the D.,. M of both the
CsCl and NaTI models, so the possible structures for STV and.
Au system are CsCl and NaTI.

[0231] The photoluminescence (PL) properties of the QD-
QD systems, including Sys-Q77 and Sys-Q75, were mea-
sured. FIG. 25A shows the photoluminescence of Sys-Q77,,,
including the control system (a mixture of Q7 and Q7 without

Jun. 23, 2016

biotin-DNA), and n=18, 30, and 50 systems. Different from
the Au-QD systems, the Q7-Q7 systems show a distance-
dependent fluorescence-enhancing behavior. The enhance-
ment factor (EF) of Sys-Q77 against the surface-to-surface
distance between Q7 and Q7 is given in FIG. 25B. EF=(I,,-
1,)/I,, where I,, and I, correspond to the PL intensity of Sys-
Q77,,and the control system, respectively. The EF is inversely
proportional to the surface-to-surface distance. FIG. 25C
shows the photoluminescence of Sys-Q75,, including the
control system (a mixture of Q7 and Q5 without biotin-
DNA), and n=18, 30, and SO systems. Such Q7-Q5 systems
show a distance-dependent fluorescence quenching of Q5 and
enhancing of Q7 behavior. The enhancement-to-quenching
factor (EQF) of Sys-Q75 against the surface-to-surface dis-
tance between Q7 and QS is given in FIG. 25D. EQF=(R,,-
R,VR,, where R=I,,5/I;,5, and the subscript n and ¢ denotes
respectively Sys-Q75, and the control system, and I,,; and
1,55 correspond to the PL intensity at 705 nm and 525 nm of
Sys-Q75, respectively. It can be seen that the EQF is propor-
tional to the surface-to-surface distance.

Example 16

QD and Pd

[0232] STV-Q7 was used to hybridize with STV-Pd NDs to
form the Sys-QPD system. The ratio of QD to Pd and biotin-
DNA was set as 1:1:40, and the X,-X, sets were designed
3-3, 15-15, and 35-35, and the systems were nominated as
Sys-QPD,,, with n=3, 30, and 50. FIG. 26 gives the 2D SAXS
pattern and corresponding S(q) for Sys-QPD5, at different
temperatures. This system show a similar temperature-depen-
dent phase behavior as system IO-Au with long DNA spacers,
and the Pd particles can’t be re-dispersed into solution. This
system doesn’t have long-range order since it actually only
shows one peak.

[0233] The photoluminescence properties of the Pd-QD
systems were also investigated. FIG. 27 shows the photolu-
minescence of Sys-QPD,,, including the control system (a
mixture of STV-PD and Q7 without biotin-DNA) andn=3 and
50 systems. Similar to the Au-QD systems, the Pd-QD sys-
tems also show a distance-dependent fluorescence quenching
behavior. To compare the QE of these two systems, we
selected Sys-QPD;, and Sys-Q7Aso, and found that the QE of
Sys-QPD,, and Sys-Q7A;, was 0.26 and 0.14, respectively.
Additionally, the particle surface-to-surface distance in Sys-
QPD5p is bigger than that in Sys-Q7A5, due to an additional
STV on PD surface. Therefore, in comparison to the Au-QD
systems, the Pd-QD systems show a more profound distance-
dependent fluorescence quenching behavior.

Example 17

IO and 10

[0234] STV-IO was used to hybridize with STV-IO to form
the Sys-II system. The ratio of IO to IO and biotin-DNA was
set as 1:1:15, and the X_,-X, sets were designed as 15-15, and
the systems were nominated as Sys-II,,. FIG. 24 gives the 2D
SAXS pattern and corresponding S(q) for Sys-II3. This sys-
tem shows very broad peaks and doesn’t have long-range
order.

Example 18

QD and Au

[0235] These systems comprised QD and Au nanoparticles.
Specifically, the 3D assembly of Au nanoparticles with three

Page 96

US 2016/0176988 Al

types of QD, namely QD705 (Q7), QD605 (Q6), and QD525
(QS). Due to the comparable DNA grafting number (f) and
hydrodynamic radius between QD and Au, a CsCl superlat-
tice similar to Au—Au system would be expected. However,
additional detailed structure information, such as composi-
tional disorder, can be studied in the QD-Au systems thanks
to the remarkable AP(q) but similar effective size for Au and
component/size-tunable QD.

[0236] Similar to Pd nanoparticles, the DNA-grafted QDs
are well-dispersed and stable in an aqueous solution. The S(q)
of three DH systems with N=30, namely, Q7_Aup ,;,
Q6_Aup 15, and Q5_Aup ;5, are given in FIG. 354. Their
S(q) displayed similar peak ratios and were assigned as SC
patterns for the binary CsCl structures. Similar to the Au
size-dependent S(q) evolution behavior in PdA—Au systems,
as the QD changes from ~2 nm CdSe/ZnS to ~6 nm CdTe/
Zn8, the intensity ratio of (110) to (100) increases caused by
the decrease of AP(q) between QD and Au NPs, which fea-
tures the binary CsCl lattice. A fit for Q7_Aup 15 using CsCl
lattice is given as black line in FIG. 35A.

[0237] The interparticle distances in these QD and Au
binary systems can also be facilely tuned by regulating DNA
length. The N was varied from 30 to 33, 45, 85, and 145 forall
these three types of binary superlattices. FIG. 35B (top) gives
the S(q) of three representative Au-Q7 systems, including
Q7_Auy js. Q7_Au,; 35, and Q7_Augs 65. The D,, of these
QD-Au systems was calculated from the SAXS data and
summarized the results as symbols in FIG. 35D, which exhib-
ited that the D,, can be tuned from ~12 to 31 nm. For short
DNA length systems, superlattices comprising larger size QD
display smaller D,., which consists with the DC-model pre-
dicted tendencies (line in FIG. 35D). However, similar D,,
were observed for all types of QD-Au superlattices with long
DNA, and this might be related to compositional disorder.
[0238] Similar to Au—Pd systems, the structural order was
improved with N and the § increased from 82 nm to 168 nm
with the increase N from 30 to 145. Besides the increase of £,
the first two peak intensity ratio (I,/I,) also increases with N
regardless of types of QD. Such intensity modulation does not
result from different nanoparticles size in systems for Pd
hybridized with Au of different sizes and Au with QD of
different types. This S(q) evolution results from the compo-
sitional order-to-disorder (OTD) transition in the binary CsCl
structures. Such OTD transition has been extensively studied
in atomic systems, such as ZnCu alloys, and recently was
demonstrated in a computational work on DNA-assembled
Au systems, which show a ODT transition with elevated
temperature approach T,,,. The ODT process can be described
by means of a long-range order parameter 1, defined as
ne(.-F ,V0-F_ma(t,-F ,/C-EF.,), where ris fraction of A
sites occupied by the “right” particles, i.e. A particles, and F ,
is fraction of A particles in the lattice. The value of r,=1, q=1
and r,=F,, 10 respectively correspond to compositional
ordered and disordered lattice.

[0239] In the case of a CsCl lattice, such a transition is
schematically illustrated in FIG. 35C, which implies that a
diffraction pattern evolution from SC to BCC will emerge as
1 decreases from | to 0. With increasing DNA length in our
QD-Au systems, the gradual increase of I,/I, values, a feature
for SC to BCC pattern evolution, indicates a smaller y for
longer DNA systems. The increase of softness of interparticle
repulsive potential with DNA length might be responsible for
this ODT transition. It’s also reasonable that the D,, becomes
similar for longer DNA Au-QD systems regardless of QD

Jun. 23, 2016

kinds because Au and QD are more like one type of “average”
nanoparticle in the superlattice for smaller Obviously, such
OTD transition can be only observed in heterogeneous sys-
tems, comprising components with quite different P(q),
which could explain the absence of such ODT transition in
our Pd (~11 nm)-Au (~10 nm) systems. The dark lines in FIG.
35B give the fit using CsCl lattice with and without consid-
eration of compositional order. By the fit, the N-dependent
for Q7-Au systems was obtained and plotted in FIG. 35C,
which shows that y decreases from ~0.98 to ~0.54 with N
increase from 30 to 145.

[0240] The N-dependent compositional and_ structural
order behaviors hints to a certain balance between DNA flex-
ibility and rigidity that is crucial for ordering. According to
this guidance, a modified-linker hybridization system was
designed, denoted by Q7_Au;3oc24, where the central
24-base segments of the 30-base linker part in Q7_Au,3. are
hybridized into a rigid duplex. FIG. 35C (Bottom) gives the
S(q) and the CsCl lattice fit for this system. Indeed,
Q7_AU, 30¢24 shows large § (>700 nm) and highly improved
crystalline quality.

[0241] The photoluminescence (PL) properties of the QD-
Au systems were also examined. FIG. 4E gives a set of
steady-state and time-resolved PL spectra collected from
Q7_Au DH systems, including N change from 145 to 85, 45
33 and 30, anda free dispersed biotinylated DNA-capped Q7
solution. A progressive PL quenching of QD is clearly
observed as decreasing N, especially for N in the range from
45 to 30. In comparison with free QD, the PL intensity of
superlattice decreases by about 8%, 20%, and 60% for
N=145, 45, and 30, respectively. The lifetime (t) also pro-
gressive decreases ftom 62.1 ns for free QD to 59.2 ns, 44.5 ns
and 16.6 ns for superlattice accordingly corresponding to
N=130, 30, and 15. The quenching efficiency, E=1-(t/t),
where 1, and t, are accordingly the lifetime of QD in the
superlattice and free-states, reached ~0.74 for the system with
N-=30, which the D,, is ~12 nm.

Example 19

Binary Systems without Au

[0242] The arbitrary binary combination of different types
of QD (Q7, Q6, and Q5), different shape of Pd (PD, PC, PO),
and JO were investigated. It was found that the grafting DNA
number on the nanoparticles (f) plays a crucial role for assem-
bly behavior. For example, QD of each three types (with f
20~40) and Pd of each three shapes (with f<15~25) can
hybridized with other into a superlattice, but the systems
containing IO nanoparticles (with {~3~8) only form non-
specific induced clusters with the size typically less than 100
nm. All these systems display thermally reversible dissocia-
tion-association behaviors, implying the DNA-directed
assembly. Structural analysis indicates that all these superlat-
tices can be assigned with CsC] lattices but of quite different
degree of structure order.

[0243] The PL behaviors of QD-based binary systems was
also investigated. The lifetime is summarized in FIG. 35F.
The superlattice shows an energy transfer process, where
involves ~20% decrease in donor lifetime and ~12% increase
in acceptor lifetime in comparison with free particles. The
current studies on fluorescence behavior of QD near metal
NPs and QD most focused on clusters, the present QD-Auand
QD-QD superlattice provide a platform to study the collective

Page 97

US 2016/0176988 Al

optical properties in 3D lattice due to their well-controlled
structural ordering and lattice parameter.

Example 20

Summary of DNA-Mediated Assembly

[0244] The phase diagram for the assembled systems is
summarized in FIG. 36A. Based on all the systems investi-
gated, several important factors of the phase behavior of
heterogeneous binary ~10 nm NP-A and B systems are
derived. i) Two threshold values, f;, and f;,, are accordingly
required for the assembly of particle into micro-scale (or to
form participate in solution) and into well ordered crystals. As
plotted in FIG. 36A, if the two components have similar
grafting DNA number, f,, is about 20 for 10 nm NPs; and n,.
could be relaxed to ~3-8 if the other component possesses a
high DNA number, i.e. f,,~60 for 10 nm NPs in the experi-
mental limit. f,, is about 30. ii) For systems involving NP-A
(for example IO) with considerable non-specific interactions,
besides the required f,, for NP-B short length DNA is neces-
sary to break and transform the non-specific interactions-
induced aggregates into DNA-driven dominant assemblies.
iii) For anisotropic shaped NPs involved systems, more
spherical-like NPs (e.g Pd-dodecahedrons) generate better
structure orders of superlattices. v) For systems involving one
type NPs with high f (e.g. Au) and the other with low f (e.g.
QD), shorter (rigid) DNA benefits the compositional order
and longer (flexible) DNA favors better structure order. A
deliberate balance between DNA rigidity and flexibility is
crucial for improving the ordering degree. This behavior is
different for systems with high f for both types NPs, and in
those systems DNA flexibility is the most important factors
for ordering. If both components possess low f, a composi-
tional disorder is favorable even for short DNA, as indicated
in QD and Pd systems that the first peak diffracted from (110)
planes.

[0245] The quantitative structural analysis demonstrated
the interparticle center-to-center distances (D.,..) of any binary
systems can be predicted from their corresponding single
systems. Taking DH systems with N=30 for example, the
effective R, (=D,,/2) of five components were calculated,
including Au, Q7, Q5, PD, and PC NPs based on the SXSA.
data from single component systems. The R, of each compo-
nent is represented by black and gray bars in FIG. 55. These
data agree well with the DC models. The values simply by the
sum of two R, agree well with the D,.. (represented by solid
narrow bars in FIG. 36B) obtained from the corresponding
binary systems. Such consistency might help one to distin-
guish the lattice types because of the dependence of D_,, on
lattice types with known SAXS data, and also benefit the
understanding of DNA configurations on NPs surfaces as
well as between nanoparticles.

[0246] Insummary for the assembly part described in these
examples, several examples for DNA-mediated assembly of
binary systems have been presented, which show rich phases,
such as Au and Au with both same and different size forming
a NaTI structure, Au and Pd most likely forming a NaTl
structure, Au and QD forming a La,O, structure, Au and IO
forming a zincblende structure, Au and STV most likely
forming a CaF, structure, QD and QD with same/different
size forming a NaTI or CsCl structure, and the system com-
prised of Pd and QD or IO and IO that most likely having an
amorphous phase. Although the examples shown are for

Jun. 23, 2016

binary systems, the use of DNA to assemble three or more
multi-component systems is also possible.

[0247] Data on the fluorescence properties of metal (Au,
Pd) and fluorescent particle (QD) systems, QD and QD sys-
tems, and the magnetic field effects on the phase behavior of
a metal (Au) and magnetic particle (IO; Fe,O,) system were
also obtained. All the measured metal-fluorescent systems
showed a distance-dependent fluorescence quenching behav-
ior. Incomparison to the Au-QD systems, the Pd-QD systems
showed a more profound quenching effect. For QD and QD
systems, the system with same types of QD showed a dis-
tance-dependent fluorescence enhancement behavior, and the
system comprised of different types of QD showed a fluores-
cence quenching for small QD and enhancement for big QD.
Metal-magnetic particle systems show a reversible magnetic
field intensity-modulation phase behavior.

[0248] Other and further embodiments utilizing one or
more aspects of the inventions described above can be
devised without departing from the spirit of Applicant’s
invention. For example, specific embodiments have been
described using gold and palladium nanoparticles of an
approximate diameter of about 10 nm, but particles of other
materials (metallic, semi-conductive, magnetic, dielectric,
etc.) of various dimensions may be substituted and still be
within the confines of this disclosure. In addition, although
the examples have, for purposes of concreteness, been
described with reference to DNA functionalization, micro-
and nano-objects can be functionalized similarly in accor-
dance with the methods of the present disclosure using RNA
or PNA, as both RNA and PNA have the same addressable
properties as does DNA, and similar melting temperatures
and structure. PNA is artificial and is therefore more resistant
to degraedation than is DNA, allowing it to be used under
conditions inimical to DNA, including but not limited to
non-aqueous solvents. Further, DNA and RNA may be used
in concert, as appropriate. Further, the various methods and
embodiments of the functionalization of DNA as described
herein can be included in combination with each other to
produce variations of the disclosed methods and embodi-
ments. Discussion of singular elements can include plural
elements and vice-versa.

[0249] The order of steps can occur in a variety of
sequences unless otherwise specifically limited. The various
steps described herein can be combined with other steps,
interlineated with the stated steps, and/or split into multiple
steps. Similarly, elements have been described functionally
and can be embodied as separate components or can be com-
bined into components having multiple functions.

[0250] The inventions have been described in the context of
preferred and other embodiments and not every embodiment
of the invention has been described. Obvious modifications
and alterations to the described embodiments are available to
those of ordinary skill in the art. The disclosed and undis-
closed embodiments are not intended to limit or restrict the
scope or applicability of the invention conceived of by the
Applicants, but rather, in conformity with the patent laws,
Applicants intend to fully protect all such modifications and
improvements that come within the scope or range of equiva-
lent of the following claims.

INCORPORATION OF SEQUENCE LISTING
[0251] Incorporated herein by reference in its entirety is the
Sequence Listing forthe application. The Sequence Listing is
disclosed on a computer-readable ASCII text file titled,
“sequence_listing.txt”, created on Dec. 22, 2015. The
sequence_listing. txt file is 1 kb in size.

Page 98

US 2016/0176988 Al

19

Jun. 23, 2016

SEQUENCE LISTING

<160> NUMBER OF SEQ ID NOS: 2
<210>
<211>
<212>
<213>
<220>
<223>

SEQ ID NO 1

LENGTH: 15

TYPE: DNA

ORGANISM: Artificial Sequence
FEATURE:

OTHER INFORMATION: Synthetic sequence

<400> SEQUENCE: 1

tacttccaat ccaat

<210>
<211l>
<212>
<213>
<220>
<223>

SEQ ID NO 2

LENGTH: 15

TYPE: DNA

ORGANISM: Artificial Sequence
FEATURE:

OTHER INFORMATION: Synthetic sequence
<400> SEQUENCE: 2

attggattgg aagta

15

15

1.-19. (canceled)

20. A three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice com-
prising a plurality of DNA-nanoparticle conjugates
assembled into one or more superlattices by a direct or linker-
mediated hybridization, wherein the DNA-nanoparticle con-
jugate, comprises: a functionalized nanoparticle; a protein
covalently bound to the functionalized nanoparticle; and
biotinylated DNA molecules coupled with the protein.

21. The three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice of
claim 20, wherein the number of the hybridized bases
between complementary DNA is 15.

22. (canceled)

23. The three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice of
claim 20, wherein the protein is streptavidin.

24. The three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice of
claim 20, wherein the covalent bond between streptavidin and
the functionalized nanoparticle is an amide bond.

25. The three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice of
claim 20, wherein the functionalized nanoparticle is function-
alized with a mercapto acid ligand.

26. The three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice of
claim 20, wherein the functionalized nanoparticle is function-
alized with a mercapto acid ligand that is a mercaptounde-
canoic acid.

27. The three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice of
claim 20, wherein the functionalized nanoparticle is function-
alized with an amphiphilic polymer.

28. The three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice of
claim 20, wherein the functionalized nanoparticle is function-
alized with an amphiphilic polymer that is a lipid-PEG car-
boxylic acid.

29. The three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice of
claim 20, wherein the functionalized nanoparticle comprises
a magnetic material, a plasmonic material, a photonic mate-
rial, a catalytic material, or a biological material, and has a
shape of an octahedron, a cube or a dodecahedron.

30. The three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice of
claim 20, wherein the functionalized nanoparticle further
comprises a magnetic material of Fe,O,. a photonic material
that is a quantum dot selected from CdSe/ZnS or CdTe/ZnS,
acatalytic material that is selected from Pdor Pt, a plasmonic
material of Au, and a biological material that is a protein.

31. (canceled)

32. The three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice of
claim 20, wherein at least one functionalized nanoparticle
within the superlattice is made from a material different than
at least one other functionalized nanoparticle within the same
superlattice.

33. The three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice of
claim 29, wherein at least one functionalized nanoparticle
within the superlattice is palladium (Pd) and at least one other
functionalized nanoparticle within the superlattice is gold
(Au), wherein at least one functionalized nanoparticle within
the superlattice is iron oxide (Fe,O,) and at least one other
functionalized nanoparticle within the superlattice is gold
(Au), or wherein at least one functionalized nanoparticle
within the superlattice is a CdSe/ZnS or CdTe/ZnS quantum
dot and at least one other functionalized nanoparticle within
the superlattice is gold (Au).

34,-35. (canceled)

36. The three-dimensional (3D) ordered superlattice of
claim 20, wherein the DNA-nanoparticle conjugate further
comprises DNA molecules attached to the functionalized
nanoparticle, a number of DNA molecules attached to the
functionalized nanoparticle ranges between 3 and 60 and a
length of DNA attached to the functionalized nanoparticle
ranges between 30 and 180 nucleotide bases.

37. (canceled)

38. (canceled)

39.-40. (canceled)

41.-42. (canceled)
Source notes & attribution
  1. https://rexresearch.com/GangDNASilica/US2016176988A1.pdf

Dossier visual record.

All 1 figures

Source illustrations for DNA–silica. Captions identify the document and evidence type.

Keep following.

Thematic connections, not evidence of a shared mechanism